This study provides preliminary evidence that falls among community-dwelling older adults are associated with factors such as age, female gender, fear of falling, history of falls, unclear vision, depression, and balance disorders. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 31
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
These findings suggested high prevalence and detrimental impact of DSD in hospitalized older adults, highlighting a need for early identification, prevention, and treatments. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 81
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Hypertension significantly increases the risk of vascular dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 768
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This analysis indicated that patients with type 2 diabetes under treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors presented with the lowest risk of dementia, followed by those treated with metformin and thiazolidinedione, while treatment with insulin was associated with the highest risk. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 530,355
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Metformin, thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone, GLP1RAs and SGLT2is were associated with reduced risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 100
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2013-08-02
Diuretic, ARB, and ACE-I use was, in addition to and/or independently of mean systolic blood pressure, associated with reduced risk of AD dementia in participants with normal cognition, while only diuretic use was associated with reduced risk in participants with MCI. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 1,928
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
Sleep
·
2017-01-01
Study objectives Mounting evidence implicates disturbed sleep or lack of sleep as one of the risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the extent of the risk is uncertain. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 69,216
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
We investigated the effect of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on the risk of dementia estimated using the validated CAIDE risk score (post-hoc analysis). 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2022-07-11
Then, voxel-wise brainwide association analyses were used to identify gray matter volumes (GMVs) associated with social isolation and with loneliness. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort
Participants: 462,619
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2023-11-27
Older adults with higher triglyceride levels within the normal to high-normal range had a lower dementia risk and slower cognitive decline over time compared with individuals with lower triglyceride levels. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 13,976
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
During a mean follow-up of 3.9 years, dementia was documented in 193 (6.3%) of the 3051 randomized participants in the actively treated group and 217 (7.1%) of the 3054 randomized participants in the placebo group (relative risk reduction, 12% [95% confidence interval, -8% to 28%]; P =.2). 4 key findings →
Participants: 6,105
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The FINGER intervention was beneficial regardless of participants' characteristics and can thus be implemented in a large elderly population at increased risk for dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,260
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2020-06-17
A healthy lifestyle as a composite score is associated with a substantially lower risk of Alzheimer's dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 1,845
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
PLoS medicine
·
2019-07-23
With no effective treatments for cognitive decline or dementia, improving the evidence base for modifiable risk factors is a research priority. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 48,522
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2019-02-01
Among ambulatory adults with hypertension, treating to a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 120 mm Hg compared with a goal of less than 140 mm Hg did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of probable dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 4,678
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The most common anticholinergic classes used were tricyclic antidepressants, first-generation antihistamines, and bladder antimuscarinics. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 3,434
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Leisure-time physical activity at midlife at least twice a week was associated with a reduced risk of dementia and AD (odds ratio [OR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.25-0.91] and 0.38 [0.17-0.85], respectively), even after adjustments for age, sex, education, follow-up time, locomotor disorders, APOE genotype, vascular disorders, smoking, and alcohol drinking. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,449
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2004-08-01
A total of 267 (3.8%) women had diabetes and 297 (4.2%) had IFG. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 267
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2021-04-01
Among 10 095 participants (67.3% men; aged 35-55 years in 1985-1988), a total of 1710 cases of diabetes and 639 cases of dementia were recorded over a median follow-up of 31.7 years. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 95
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
EClinicalMedicine
·
2024-07-10
Each matched cohort included 23,386 (semaglutide vs sitagliptin), 22,584 (vs empagliflozin), and 19,206 (vs glipizide) patients. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 23,386
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Emerging evidence suggests that treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) could be an interesting treatment strategy to reduce neurological complications such as stroke, cognitive impairment, and peripheral neuropathy. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 19
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The sample was mostly female (65%), White (76%), and 74 years old on average. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort
Participants: 342,608
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
A total of seven studies were included. The forest plot results showed that taking lithium therapy reduced the risk of AD (RR 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.78) and is also protective in reducing the risk of dementia (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77). 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
GeroScience
·
2025-04-11
Sleep disorders, particularly insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea, are increasingly implicated as significant contributors to cognitive decline, dementia, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
BMC medicine
·
2025-02-25
The cohort study revealed that persistent HI significantly increased the risk of heart disease (P < 0.001, HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.31-2.03), stroke (P 0.004, HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.18), chronic lung disease (P 0.002, HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.17-1.99), and emotional, nervous, or psychiatric problems (P 0.016, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.14-3.60). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 504,307
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.