31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
RO emphasised the engagement of nursing assistants in a hopeful, therapeutic process but became associated with a rigid, confrontational approach to people with dementia, leading to its use becoming less and less common. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 718 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Relative to a control condition, we found moderate-quality evidence showing a small to moderate effect of CT on our first primary outcome, composite measure of global cognition at end of treatment (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.62), and high-quality evidence showing a moderate effect on the secondary outcome of verbal semantic fluency (SMD 0.52, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.81) at end of treatment, with these gains retained in the medium term (3 to 12 months post treatment). 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 653 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Between Feb 24, 2021, and March 5, 2023, 377 dyads were randomly assigned (1:1), 189 to usual treatment and 188 to intervention. 2 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 377 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention is a longitudinal observational cohort study enriched with persons with a parental history (PH) of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,561 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
As one of few meta-analyses comparing different quantities of physical activity and exercise interventions for AD in details, our study suggests that physical activity and exercise can improve cognition of older adults with AD. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 673 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall estimates of treatment effect were calculated using a fixed-effect model, and statistical heterogeneity was measured using a standard Chi(2) statistic. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Thirty-five studies were analyzed with data from 3268 caregivers (pooled mean age [SD of sample means], 63.48 [5.99] years; 76.7% female) were analyzed. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study underscores the substantial prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among informal carers of individuals with dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 11,134 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Only behavior management therapies, specific types of caregiver and residential care staff education, and possibly cognitive stimulation appear to have lasting effectiveness for the management of dementia-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,632 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Two longitudinal studies with different populations demonstrated that loneliness was a risk factor for the development of the pain, depression, and fatigue symptom cluster over time. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 115 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sixteen men and 24 women diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease participated in the study. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Loneliness is a perceived state of social and emotional isolation that has been associated with cognitive and functional decline and an increased risk of incident AD dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 25 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Attendance was good (82.8% attended ≥4/6 sessions). 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Depression, anxiety and sleep problems are the main challenges that are faced by family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 309 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Neurological and mental illnesses account for a considerable proportion of the global burden of disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This pilot trial justifies KD studies in mild Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep quality decreases with aging and thus sleep complaints are prevalent in older adults, particularly for those with cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep was correlated more among dyads living with dementia than those with other chronic conditions. 5 key findings →
Participants: 462 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
One factor accounted for 79.0% of the variance in the UCLALS3; it was perfectly invariant across genders but variant at the metric level across countries. 5 key findings →
Participants: 571 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Nutritional care and support should be an integral part of dementia management. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Estimates suggest that there are more than 10 million adult caregivers of persons with dementia, two-thirds of who experience some form of sleep disturbance during the course of their caregiving career. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Probable dementia caregiving predicted worse sleep quality, which mediated the relationship with higher depressive symptoms. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,422 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Most people with dementia (PwD) live with the support of their caregiver. 2 key findings →
Participants: 31 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Out of 163 caregivers invited to participate, 104 (64%) participated. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Five out of six enrolled dyads completed the sessions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events