28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
INTRODUCTIONMultimodal biomarkers have transformed Alzheimers disease research, but the incremental contribution of each modality to predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains unclear. 3 key findings →
Participants: 2,430 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundAccurate prediction of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimers disease (AD) is important for prognosis, patient management, and clinical trial enrollment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,430 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
IntroductionPolygenic risk scores (PRS) may improve Alzheimers disease (AD) risk prediction before symptom onset, yet choosing an appropriate model can be challenging. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimers disease (AD) is characterized by substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity, with diverse neuroanatomical, cognitive, clinical, functional, and genetic risk profiles that are poorly captured by current diagnostic frameworks. 4 key findings →
Participants: 393 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Brain iron accumulation is well established in Alzheimers disease (AD), but whether the two share a genetic basis remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundAlzheimers disease (AD) pathology often accumulates years before memory loss, creating a need to identify high-risk individuals presymptomatically. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sex differences in Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic effects and regulatory contexts remain incompletely resolved. 3 key findings →
Participants: 449,335 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ObjectiveTo determine whether a multi-trait polygenic profile for dementia is associated with dementia- and disability-free survival in middle-aged and older adults. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
White matter hyperintensities (WMH), a key MRI-marker of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD), are common in older adults and associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 46,944 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe genetic architecture of Alzheimer disease remains incompletely understood. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder whose genetic architecture and underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood, particularly in sporadic disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Implications of menopause hormone therapy (MHT) for cognitive aging remain unclear despite decades of research. 3 key findings →
Participants: 8,741 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
INTRODUCTIONMultimodal lifestyle interventions can delay or slow Alzheimers disease (AD) in at-risk older adults, and plasma pTau217, a blood-based biomarker, now enables scalable AD risk stratification. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
INTRODUCTIONAlzheimers, Lewy body and vascular neuropathology underpin the most common forms of dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cellular mechanisms in early Alzheimers disease (AD) remain poorly understood despite generation of extensive observational multiomic data. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The lipids and proteins that comprise lipid droplets regulate several cellular functions including lipid storage, stress responses, and inflammation. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To better characterize the genetic architecture underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementia (ADRD), we performed a meta-analysis of European ancestry genome-wide association studies in 128,681 cases or proxy cases of ADRD and 849,833 (proxy) controls. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Established AD risk factors, including APOE ε4 dosage and polygenic risk scores, were not associated with disease progression amyloid positive individuals who are actively declining. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 222 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Almost every recent Alzheimer's disease (AD) genome-wide association study (GWAS) has performed meta-analysis to combine studies with clinical diagnosis of AD with studies that use proxy phenotypes based on parental disease history. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The cross-ancestry Bayesian PRS model demonstrated the highest predictive performance in non-European populations. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The global outbreak of COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been linked to long-term neurological complications, including an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) among older adults. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Single cell RNA sequencing has opened a window into clarifying the complex underpinnings of disease, particularly in quantifying the relevance of tissue- and cell-type-specific gene expression. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although human cerebellum is known to be neuropathologically impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (ADRD), the cell type-specific transcriptional and epigenomic changes that contribute to this pathology are not well understood. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Triggering Receptors Expressed on Myeloid cells (TREMs) are a family of cell-surface receptors instrumental in the activation of different myeloid cells. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Psychosis is a neuropsychiatric feature found across neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →