Our studies point to increased APP gene dose as a compromising retromer function in DS and suggest a causal role for Aβ42 and Aβ40. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Our studies point to increased APP gene dose as a compromising retromer function in DS and suggest a causal role for Aβ42 and Aβ40. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In fetuses with Down syndrome, neurons fail to show normal dendritic development, yielding a "tree in winter" appearance. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To gain insights into the different forms of modified amyloid beta peptides (A beta) in the Alzheimer disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS) brain, we used two-site ELISAs with antibodies specific for isomerized (i.e. A beta with L-isoaspartate at positions 1 and 7) and pyroglutamate-modified (i.e. A beta beginning with pyroglutamate at position 3) forms of A beta to quantitate the levels of these different A beta peptides in formic acid extracts of AD and DS frontal cortex. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Florbetapir PET can be used to detect increased cerebral-to-cerebellar fibrillar Aβ burden in a Down syndrome patient with Alzheimer disease, even in the presence of frequent amyloid angiopathy and diffuse plaques in the cerebellum. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Down syndrome (DS) is a common genetic condition caused by the presence of three copies of chromosome 21 (trisomy 21). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In adults with DS, early amyloid-β accumulation in the striatum is divergent from sporadic AD; however, despite the early striatal amyloid-β, glucose hypometabolism was confined to the typical AD-associated regions, which occurs similarly in autosomal dominant AD. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
People with Down syndrome (DS) have increased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD), presumably conferred through genetic predispositions arising from trisomy 21. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We propose that sleep disruption is a lever arm that influences how cognition emerges in development and then declines in response to Alzheimer disease in people with Down syndrome. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The findings of this study highlight the importance of accurate mortality data for studying and addressing population health trends. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundLifetime incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Down syndrome (DS) exceeds 90%. 2 key findings →
Participants: 18 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Adults with DS may have unique neuro- and cardio- protective factors that deserve future investigation. 4 key findings →
Participants: 96 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Adults with DS are often supported by family caregiver(s), who face challenges including lack of awareness of the increased risk of developing AD, difficulty in obtaining a timely diagnosis, limited resources for psychosocial support, and lack of access to clinical trials. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have high levels of oxidative stress throughout the lifespan. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Down syndrome (DS) is one of the most common causes of intellectual disability, owing to trisomy of all or part of chromosome 21. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study examines cortical organoids generated from a panel of isogenic trisomic and disomic iPSC lines (subclones) as a model of early fetal brain development in Down syndrome (DS). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These data point to significant reductions in KLC1 in AD and AD-DS. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The modified questionnaire and interview instruments capture a range of impairment in DS adults, including subthreshold symptomatology, and the instruments provide complementary information relevant to the ascertainment of dementia in DS. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Down syndrome (DS), caused by trisomy 21, is the most prevalent genetic condition associated with accelerated aging and near-universal development of early-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Specific health plans for DS and conducting clinical and translational research on the challenges of aging, including AD, are necessary and feasible. 1 key finding →
Participants: 114 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There is an urgent need for objective markers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related cognitive impairment in people with Down syndrome (DS) to improve diagnosis, monitor disease progression and assess response to disease-modifying therapies. 4 key findings →
Participants: 80 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Understanding the distribution of SV2A in DS will provide insight on changes to synaptic density in populations with accelerated AD neuropathology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 94 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Understanding the distribution of SV2A in DS will provide insight on changes to synaptic density in populations with accelerated AD neuropathology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 94 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study provides new insights into the regional binding distribution of a first-generation and a second-generation Tau tracer in limbic and neocortical regions in adults with DS, as well as regional differences in Tau binding in adult with DS vs. those with AD. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A key challenge to adults with Down syndrome (DS) as they age is an increased risk for cognitive decline, dementia, and Alzheimer disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Stem cells are central to the development and maintenance of many tissues. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events