30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This review has shown that wearable systems are used mostly for the monitoring and provision of feedback on posture and upper extremity movements in stroke rehabilitation. 4 key findings →
Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After removal of duplicates, our initial search returned 3955 records. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Online education involving a celebrity may be an effective strategy for educating college students about AD risk reduction strategies. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 721 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This paper explores the rationale for a mobile phone-led intervention and details the app's effect on behavior change and subsequent clinical outcomes. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 102 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Caregiver stress is associated with negative outcomes for both caregivers and care recipients. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 14 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study demonstrates the feasibility of robust CMB detection using only 2D T2*-weighted GRE MRI. 2 key findings →
Participants: 758 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We are currently in the recruitment and data collection phase. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,307 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
7B8 effectively alleviates cognitive impairment and clears cerebral and perivascular amyloid deposits in young APP/PS1 mice with early-stage AD pathology and minimal CAA, with no increased risk of microhemorrhage in this experimental setting. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Four cognitive phenotypes emerged. One phenotype (18% of Aβ+ participants) showed the steepest cognitive decline, highest progression on the CDR, greater baseline medial temporal tau, and fastest neocortical tau accumulation over 4.6 years (hazard ratio [HR] for decline ≈ 2.9). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly population (aged 65 years and over), followed by vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, and rare types of neurodegenerative diseases, including frontotemporal dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These programs are considered beneficial nonpharmacological cognitive training interventions for middle-aged women at high risk of cognitive impairment. 1 key finding →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Due to the reduced variability in endpoints when using digital twins as covariates in statistical analyses, the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial could have enrolled up to 24% fewer control arm participants to draw the same conclusions about treatment efficacy as previously reported for the study's primary outcome, the integrated Alzheimer Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) at 18 months. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Multifunctional liposomes (mf-LIPs) having a curcumin-lipid ligand (to target amyloids) together with two ligands to target the transferrin, and the low-density apolipoprotein receptor of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) on their surface, were previously studied (in vitro) as potential theranostic systems for Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Papadia et al., 2017, Eur. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Delivery of cognitive rehabilitation by telehealth appeared feasible but required modifications such as greater reliance on caregivers and clients for manipulating materials. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lead compounds directed to the 5' leader of the Amyloid Precursor Protein transcript (i.e., paroxetine (SSRI), N-acetyl cysteine (antioxidant), and erythromycin (macrolide antibiotic)) were employed in a pilot study to evaluate their anti-amyloid efficacy in the TgCRND8 transgenic mouse model for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the metalloprotein that is cleaved to generate the pathogenic Abeta peptide. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A pilot study was conducted employing a well known mouse model for Alzheimer's disease to evaluate the anti-amyloid efficacy of three FDA pre-approved drugs. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The VHA is well-positioned to use a hybrid approach-both telehealth and in-person care-to support the provision of amyloid-targeting therapies for veterans with AD. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now a credible translational research platform across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathway, but its clinical value is often difficult to judge from performance metrics alone. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We trained a self-configuring nnU-Net model for CMB segmentation in a hetero-geneous multicenter sample ( n =264), including 1.5T and 3T field strengths, SWI and T2*-GRE sequences, and community and clinical cohorts. 1 key finding →
Participants: 264 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A bstract INTRODUCTION Treatment response in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) varies substantially across patients, yet no validated frameworks exist to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) from observational data while controlling for confounding bias. 2 key findings →
Participants: 4,049 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events