31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Of 275 patients, 51 (18.5%) had persistent coma and died in the hospital. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 275 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The average life expectancy of people with dementia at time of diagnosis ranged from 5.7 years at age 65 to 2.2 at age 85 in men and from 8.0 to 4.5, respectively, in women. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 5,553,960 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study cohort included 568 patients (289 [50.9%] men; mean [SD] age, 70.5 [16.1] years) who died in the hospital or were discharged to hospice. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 568 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that clinicians should consider sedative-associated, hypoxic, and septic delirium, which often co-occur, as distinct indicators of acute brain injury and seek to identify all potential risk factors that may impact on long-term cognitive impairment, especially those that are iatrogenic and potentially modifiable such as sedation. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,048 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Major postoperative complications and delirium are separately associated with adverse events and demonstrate a combined effect. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 566 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The rising prevalence of dementia will have an impact on acute hospitals. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 617 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 23 558 people without pre-existing dementia, 4135 (17·6%) had an admission with delirium. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 23,558 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There is some evidence that multifaceted interventions in hospital reduce the number of falls and that use of hip protectors in care homes prevents hip fractures. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is an important independent prognostic determinant of hospital outcomes including new nursing home placement, death or new nursing home placement, and functional decline-even after controlling for age, gender, dementia, illness severity, and functional status. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 727 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is a frequent complication in older ICU patients and often persists beyond their ICU stay. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 45 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia, depression and anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders among older adults in LTC. 3 key findings →
Participants: 74 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this observational study, zinc deficiency was associated with increased 1-year mortality and infection-related complications in patients with dementia, with evidence of a dose–response relationship. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,241 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In both the mortality and readmission cohorts we found significant associations with each pollutant. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 118 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This is the first study to continuously monitor mobility levels early during a hospital stay. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In our dataset search, we identified 108 910 people with a record indicating dementia at any time. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 9,819 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Pain is an understudied problem in frail elderly patients, especially those with cognitive impairment, delirium, or dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 325 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During the study period, the risk of mortality in hip fracture patients was 3-fold higher than that in the general population and included every major cause of death. 2 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
length of stay, need for a higher level of care, and mortality after discharge in patients with and without delirium. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 33 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 1,372,570 HH patients, 30% had diagnosed dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It remains unclear whether the combined conditions confer an excess risk of hypoglycaemia-related hospitalisation beyond the risks associated with either condition alone. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 329,566 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events