Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 8,101–8,125 of 8,338 studies · tagged Brain Biology (page 325 of 334) · 30,180 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in the Different Stages of Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research square 2024-07-23

This study explored the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) by examining changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of UPS proteins along with disease progression, AD imaging biomarkers (PiB PET, tau PET), neurodegeneration imaging measures (MRI, FDG PET), and Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR®). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Frontotemporal Dementia Patient Neurons With Progranulin Deficiency Display Protein Dyshomeostasis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2023-01-20

Haploinsufficiency of progranulin (PGRN) causes frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a devastating neurodegenerative disease with no effective treatment. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Associations of genetic predisposition to Alzheimer’s disease with blood-based biomarkers: a community-based study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-23

The blood-based biomarker (BBM) profiles associated with genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in general older populations remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →

Participants: 3,947 Evidence: low

NOS1AP is an adaptor for neuronal nitric oxide synthase that engages several partner proteins and is implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Blood-based neurofilament light (NfL) is associated with all-cause mortality, but whether this reflects neuroaxonal injury or overlaps with cognitive and functional decline remains unclear. 3 key findings →

Participants: 559 Evidence: moderate

Interventions targeting lifestyle and health behaviors support cognition in older adults at risk of dementia. 5 key findings →

Participants: 1,260 Evidence: high

NOS1AP is a genetically validated driver of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet the NOS1AP-tau interaction itself has remained pharmacologically untargeted. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Cannabidiol for chronic neuroinflammation: clinical pharmacology and what an interpretable trial will require

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Authorea Preprints 2026-10-05

Public interest in cannabinoid medicines has outpaced the clinical pharmacology needed to judge product, dose and route. 5 key findings →

Design: narrative review Evidence: low

SHED-Derived Exosomes Attenuate Alzheimer's Disease Pathology in iPSC-Derived Cerebral Organoid Model

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-29

SHED exosome treatment demonstrated genotype-specific efficacy, selectively reducing p181-tau levels and restoring the p181-tau/Aβ42 ratio in FAD lines while elevating the protective Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio across both FAD and SAD backgrounds. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Clinically Relevant Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease Are Associated with Age and Cortical Atrophy in Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes )

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-18

Chimpanzees share a number of age-related brain changes with humans, such as reductions in neurons and increases in neuropathology. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate

A New Frontier in CWD Detection: Antemortem Plasma Biomarkers and Behavioral Profiling in Transgenic Mouse Models

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-10

Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) is a fatal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) that is confined to cervids (deer, moose, elk, and reindeer) but shares key properties with human neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s disease and frontal-temporal dementia. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

CSF Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers in Relation to Functional Status and Tofersen Treatment Response in ALS

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-28

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease primarily affecting motor neurons but also frequently involving cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Brain-wide Cerebrospinal Fluid Recirculation Collapse in Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-04

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and the glymphatic system are essential for maintaining brain homeostasis, yet the precise mechanisms driving their profound failure in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remain largely elusive. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Regional choroid plexus calcifications and their associations with aging, brain structure, and disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-16

The choroid plexus (CP) maintains brain homeostasis through cerebrospinal fluid production and formation of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and its dysfunction has been linked with aging and neurological disease. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Spatial proximity to AD pathology defines cell-type and genotype-specific characteristics in human AD hippocampus

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-21

How amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau phosphorylation spatially relate to cell response and genetic variation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain is currently unclear. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

In the primary matched-feature comparison, reference areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.851 for ADNI tau90, 0.860 for ADNI tau180, and 0.933 for OASIS3 tau180. 3 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Mapping polygenic risk scores to brain cells: insights for neurodegenerative diseases

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-11

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are driven by multiple related yet distinct pathological processes that evolve over decades, resulting in substantial clinical and neuropathological heterogeneity. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

From across this tag

10 of the 8,313 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.9%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed