Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 8,051–8,075 of 8,227 studies · tagged Brain Biology (page 323 of 330) · 29,780 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and glioblastoma (GBM) share common aging-related risk factors, they lead to opposite cellular fates—neurodegeneration versus uncontrolled proliferation. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

CEP-IP with CMRF in SEA-AD Microglia: A Mitochondrial Co-expression Module Linked to Cognition

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-27

Single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) studies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) routinely filter nuclei by mitochondrial percentage (%MT) or remove mitochondrial genes, yet whether these reads carry information about cognition is rarely examined. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Integrated Transcriptomic and Structural Prioritization of Sulforaphane Targets in Neurodegeneration: A Multi-Dataset In Silico Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-25

Sulforaphane (SFN), a natural isothiocyanate from cruciferous vegetables, exerts neuroprotective effects through mechanisms extending beyond canonical Nrf2/ARE activation. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

RNA-sequencing of butyrate-treated human lymphoblastoid cell lines shows dysregulated genes of multiple disease-related pathways

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-24

Butyrate, a 4-carbon fatty acid produced from insoluble starch by the gut microbiome, plays key roles in mitochondrial respiration, activation of cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors, and protein acetylation by inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

[ 18 F]Tauvid and [ 18 F]MK6240 capture largely overlapping patterns of tau pathology, but differ notably in the magnitude of off-target binding. 3 key findings →

Participants: 681 Evidence: moderate

Complement-mediated neuroinflammation has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its role during the pre-symptomatic phase of the disease remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Participants: 708 Evidence: moderate

The disorders fell into one of three categories based on the topographic relationship of the disease-specific and healthy networks. 5 key findings →

Participants: 1,117 Evidence: low

Progressive neurodegeneration of the locus coeruleus drives rapid eye movement sleep fragmentation

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-16

Sleep disturbances are common early features of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Glial Transcriptomic Convergence in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease with Independent Retinal and Aqueous-Humor Evidence

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-09-30

We then integrated healthy retinal expression, AD retinal proteomics, and PD aqueous-humor proteomics with the brain-concordance results. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Brain-resident myeloid cells promote rapid leukocyte adhesion in leptomeningeal vessels after anti-Aβ immunotherapy

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-11

Anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) immunotherapy improves cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but is associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), through poorly understood mechanisms. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Amyloid plaques, one of the defining features of Alzheimer’s disease, are associated with synapse loss and accumulation of pathological tau in dystrophic neurites and reactive glia in their immediate vicinity. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

A major obstacle to effective Alzheimer’s disease therapy is the limited ability to deliver therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Distinct PTMs delineate the compartment-specific architectural signatures of Aβ deposits. 2 key findings →

Participants: 19 Evidence: low

Intravenous anti-Aβ immunotherapy acutely increases cerebral amyloid angiopathy and vascular damages in APOE4 mice

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-02-11

Anti-Aβ immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) have high rates of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), an adverse side effect with markedly higher rates in APOE4 carriers. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

A Biophysical Framework for Neurodegeneration: Prioritizing Protein Homeostasis Over Aggregate Toxicity

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2025-12-31

Neurodegenerative research has long hypothesized that aggregated proteins such as amyloid‑β (Aβ), tau, and α‑synuclein (αSyn) are intrinsically toxic and are directly associated with the etiologies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

ScFv-h3D6 Prevents Bapineuzumab-Induced Hemorrhagic Events in the APP23 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2025-11-05

The occurrence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), found in clinical trials for Aβ-immunotherapy, has been related to the antibody’s effector function on glial activation by the Fc portion of the antibody. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

From across this tag

10 of the 8,203 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 29,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 29,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (63.8% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.5% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed