Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Locus coeruleus intensity as a marker of early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: associations with plasma pTau 217 and memory

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-09

These findings support MRI-derived LC intensity as a marker of early AD-related processes and suggest that LC intensity may provide complementary information not captured by plasma pTau 217 alone. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 163 Evidence: moderate

PVeD reproducibly contextualized associations between plasma pTau217 and PET-defined Alzheimer pathology across cohorts with different participant composition, pTau217 assays, PET tracers, and cognitive measures. 2 key findings →

Participants: 602 Evidence: low

Clinical expression beyond measured Alzheimer disease molecular pathology: a discovery and external evaluation study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-31

A prespecified structure–reserve–glial profile captured reproducible cognitive variation beyond measured Alzheimer disease molecular pathology across two cohorts. 1 key finding →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 436 Evidence: moderate

Complement-mediated neuroinflammation has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its role during the pre-symptomatic phase of the disease remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Participants: 708 Evidence: moderate

Estimating amyloid-β deposition using brain perfusion SPECT in Alzheimer's disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-19

Brain perfusion SPECT revealed AD-typical hypoperfusion patterns and demonstrated modest potential to estimate the presence or absence of Aβ deposition with left parietal rCBF. 5 key findings →

Participants: 88 Evidence: low

Biomarker-Informed Interpretation of Dyadic Cognitive Function Index Scores in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-07-30

Amyloid regional extent and tau PET were associated with different features of dyadic CFI data: reporter balance and CFI burden across reporters, respectively. 4 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,686 Evidence: moderate

Multivariate blood biomarkers capture resilience and resistance phenotypes across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-08-05

Alzheimer’s disease pathology and cognitive outcomes frequently diverge, yet current single-axis definitions cannot identify resilient (high pathology, preserved cognition) and resistant (high risk, low pathology) subgroups reliably at scale, obscuring the mechanisms that uncouple pathological burden from cognitive decline. 2 key findings →

Participants: 1,009 Evidence: moderate

Regional Cerebrospinal Fluid Motility as a Key Determinant of Soluble Amyloid-β Levels and Kinetics

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-03

Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy are characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) species, yet the human fluid-physiological mechanisms that regulate soluble Aβ transport and clearance remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →

Participants: 502 Evidence: moderate

Investigating the Amyloid-Tau-Neurodegeneration Framework in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Semi-Supervised Multimodal Imaging Data Fusion

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-15

Semi-supervised multimodal fusion improves prediction and reveals interpretable imaging patterns that predict APOE4 and clinical diagnoses better than traditional approaches. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Retinal biomarkers and dementia risk: A review of evidence across the 14 Lancet modifiable risk factors for dementia

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. PsyArXiv 2026-10-22

As the only central nervous system tissue that can be directly imaged non-invasively using widely available technology, the retina offers a uniquely accessible window into the brain. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology is increasingly recognized to manifest in the retina, offering a non-invasive window for early biomarker discovery. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 40 Evidence: moderate

CSF Aβ42 rose from 526.0 to 1053.0 pg/mL (+ 100.2%), total tau (t-tau) fell from 578.2 to 278.0 pg/mL(-51.9%), and phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) fell from 90.8 to 23.1 pg/mL(-74.6%). 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

The complete absence of ARIA distinguishes XPro1595 from amyloid-targeting therapies and supports its potential for use in combination strategies and potentially for those at a higher risk of ARIA. 5 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: high

Electrochemical biosensors offer a promising route for the rapid, non-invasive detection of disease biomarkers by converting biochemical interactions into measurable electrical signals. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Plasma pTau-181 demonstrates flat or declining longitudinal trajectories and minimal cognitive correlation, suggesting tau is a static biomarker rather than a dynamic therapeutic target in mid-to-late adulthood. 2 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,523 Evidence: moderate

DESI is a robust, fully automated MRI biomarker that sensitively detects CSF redistribution characteristic of DESH in iNPH. 1 key finding →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,032 Evidence: moderate

Early, scalable detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains a global health priority, but non-invasive biomarkers that capture network-level dysfunction during standardized cognitive challenge remain limited. 1 key finding →

Participants: 13 Evidence: moderate

Launched in 2010 by the National Institutes of Health, the Human Connectome Project (HCP) represents a foundational initiative in systems neuroscience, designed to map the structural and functional architecture of the human brain. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Prenatal Pesticide Exposure and Early Alzheimer Disease-Related Biomarker and Cognitive Changes in Midlife

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-05-17

In this prospective birth cohort study, prenatal exposure to a persistent environmental toxicant was associated with lower plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and worse cognitive performance in midlife, consistent with DDE accelerating the preclinical trajectory of AD-related biological changes decades before symptom onset. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 179 Evidence: moderate

The Gut-Brain Axis Mechanism in Alzheimer’s Disease: From Animal Models to Clinical Translation and Innovative Treatment Strategies

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-07-30

Research on gut microbiota in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has progressed from observational correlations to the validation of causal relationships. 3 key findings →

Evidence: high

From across this tag

10 of the 2,804 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed