Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Read this before the table

Raw citation count rewards being old. A paper published in 2010 has had fifteen years to collect citations; one published last year has had months. Raw counts also reward being in a big, busy field. Ranking only by raw count tells you mostly which papers are oldest and most famous — which you probably already knew.

RCR (Relative Citation Ratio) is the fairer number. It is calculated by the NIH and is normalised for both field and year: it compares a paper against other papers of the same age in the same research area. An RCR of 1.0 is exactly average for NIH-funded work in that field and year. 2.0 means roughly twice the citations a typical comparable paper gets; 0.5 means about half.

So: RCR is our primary ranking and answers "most influential for its age and field". Raw count is the secondary ranking and answers "most cited in absolute terms". Both columns are shown in every table so you can see where they disagree — and they disagree a lot.

All numbers retrieved 2026-09-27. Citation counts change daily; a number here is a reading taken on that date, not a permanent property of the paper.

What we could and could not measure

Of 7080 unique studies in the library (after removing duplicates by PubMed ID, then DOI, then title):

  • 7043 have a citation count from iCite.
  • 6917 have an RCR. RCR cannot be computed until a paper has been out long enough to accumulate a citation history, so 126 indexed papers — nearly all of them very recent — have a citation count but no RCR yet.
  • 7060 have a count from OpenAlex, 6998 from Semantic Scholar.
  • 17 are not indexed in any of the three. These are regulatory documents, company announcements and conference presentations rather than journal articles.

A paper with no citation data is not a paper with zero citations. It is a paper these indexes do not cover. Those rows read not indexed below and are never counted as 0, never averaged in, and never imputed.

The three sources disagree, and we show that rather than hide it

On the 7040 papers where both iCite and OpenAlex returned a number, they gave a different answer for 6894 of them. The median gap is a factor of 1.3×, and the widest is 728.0×.

That is normal. Each index covers a different set of journals and counts references differently — OpenAlex indexes preprints and book chapters that iCite does not, for instance. We store every source's number separately and never average them. The ranking columns below are labelled with the source they come from; the other sources' numbers are in the downloadable data.

This view keeps only the 1464 studies about something that can in principle be changed — diet, physical activity, sleep, hearing, blood pressure, alcohol, vaccination, medicines and multidomain lifestyle programmes — and removes papers whose subject is a biomarker assay, a brain scan, a genome-wide scan or laboratory biology. Those are important, but a heavily-cited amyloid biomarker paper does not answer the question "what is worth studying about things people can change".

Most influential — ranked by RCR

40 with an RCR

Field- and time-normalised. 1.0 is the NIH-funded average for that field and year. Source: iCite (NIH), retrieved 2026-09-27.

Studies ranked by Relative Citation Ratio
# Study Year RCR Citations Sources Study details
1 Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. The Lancet · systematic review 2024 722.03 3,038 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
2 Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Public Health 2022 472.85 4,521 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
3 Alzheimer's disease Lancet (London, England) · review 2021 307.99 4,232 iCiteOpenAlex retrieved 2026-09-27
4 Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis Nature reviews. Endocrinology · review 2019 196.10 3,690 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
5 New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nature Genetics · meta-analysis 2022 170.65 2,052 iCiteOpenAlex retrieved 2026-09-24
6 MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1987 140.61 4,334 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
7 The epidemiology of Parkinson's disease Lancet (London, England) · review 2024 137.27 689 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
8 The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · meta-analysis 2013 129.96 3,373 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
9 Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty Nature reviews. Cardiology · review 2018 126.18 2,902 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
10 Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · randomised controlled trial 2011 111.36 3,255 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
11 A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet · randomised controlled trial 2015 107.59 2,632 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
12 Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing Nature genetics · meta-analysis 2019 106.15 2,441 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
13 Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association Stroke · review 2011 99.43 3,053 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
14 Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study Lancet (London, England) · systematic review 2005 99.24 3,530 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
15 Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 The Lancet. Neurology · systematic review 2019 98.42 1,847 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27

Show all 40 studies (15 shown so far)

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Most cited — ranked by raw citation count

40 with a count

Absolute totals, not adjusted for age or field. Expect older papers to crowd the top. Source: iCite (NIH), retrieved 2026-09-27.

Studies ranked by raw citation count
# Study Year Citations RCR Sources Study details
1 Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Public Health 2022 4,521 472.85 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
2 MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging AJR. American journal of roentgenology 1987 4,334 140.61 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
3 Alzheimer's disease Lancet (London, England) · review 2021 4,232 307.99 iCiteOpenAlex retrieved 2026-09-27
4 Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis Nature reviews. Endocrinology · review 2019 3,690 196.10 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
5 Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study Lancet (London, England) · systematic review 2005 3,530 99.24 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
6 The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · meta-analysis 2013 3,373 129.96 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
7 Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · randomised controlled trial 2011 3,255 111.36 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
8 Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association Stroke · review 2011 3,053 99.43 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
9 Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. The Lancet · systematic review 2024 3,038 722.03 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
10 Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty Nature reviews. Cardiology · review 2018 2,902 126.18 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
11 A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet · randomised controlled trial 2015 2,632 107.59 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24
12 Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing Nature genetics · meta-analysis 2019 2,441 106.15 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
13 Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease The New England journal of medicine 2002 2,346 61.09 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
14 Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · review 2015 2,215 97.30 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-27
15 Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 1999 2,196 77.54 iCiteOpenAlexSemantic Scholar retrieved 2026-09-24

Show all 40 studies (15 shown so far)

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Retractions and corrections in this library

1 retraction, 14 corrections

A library that never mentions these is less trustworthy, not more. A correction usually means a number or a figure was fixed — it does not mean the paper was withdrawn. A retraction does.

Retracted

Corrected after publication

What this page is not

Citation counts measure attention from other researchers. They are not a measure of whether a finding is correct, whether it replicated, or whether it should change anything you do. Papers are sometimes heavily cited because they were controversial or later disputed — one of the papers in this library has been retracted and is still cited.

Nothing on this page is health advice, and a high rank here is not evidence that a treatment or a behaviour works. For what the studies actually found, read the research summaries. For decisions about care, talk to a clinician.

Sources: iCite (NIH), OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar. All retrieved 2026-09-27. See also what research is needed next.