Home › Research › Cognitive tests and assessment
Validity and Reliability Study of Online Cognitive Tracking Software (BEYNEX)
Nilgün Çınar, Sude Aslan Kendirli, Miruna Florentina Ateş, Ezgi Yakupoğlu, Ebru Akbuğa, Naci Emre Bolu, Fenise Selin Karalı, Tuğba Okluoğlu et al.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2024-02-06
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Beynex categorization scores showed a moderate agreement with MoCA ratings (weighted Cohen's Kappa = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38-0.60). Calculated Cronbach's Alpha indicates good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability analysis using a linear regression line fitted to results yielded R∧2 of 0.65 with a 95% CI: 0.58, 0.71. Beynex's ability to reliably detect and track cognitive impairment could significantly impact public health, early intervention strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Key findings
- Beynex categorization scores showed a moderate agreement with MoCA ratings (weighted Cohen's Kappa = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38-0.60).
- Calculated Cronbach's Alpha indicates good internal consistency.
- Test-retest reliability analysis using a linear regression line fitted to results yielded R∧2 of 0.65 with a 95% CI: 0.58, 0.71.
- Beynex's ability to reliably detect and track cognitive impairment could significantly impact public health, early intervention strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Study details
- Participants91
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 50/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 28 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 50 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 91 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38405342) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 28 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 50 out of 100. |
| Total | 50 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Çınar, N., Kendirli, S. A., Ateş, M. F., Yakupoğlu, E., Akbuğa, E., Bolu, N. E., et al. (2024). Validity and Reliability Study of Online Cognitive Tracking Software (BEYNEX). Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. https://doi.org/10.3233/adr-230117
Vancouver
Çınar N, Kendirli SA, Ateş MF, Yakupoğlu E, Akbuğa E, Bolu NE, et al. Validity and Reliability Study of Online Cognitive Tracking Software (BEYNEX). Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. 2024. doi:10.3233/adr-230117. PMID: 38405342.
BibTeX
@article{cnar2024-38405342,
author = {Çınar, Nilgün and Kendirli, Sude Aslan and Ateş, Miruna Florentina and Yakupoğlu, Ezgi and Akbuğa, Ebru and Bolu, Naci Emre and Karalı, Fenise Selin and Okluoğlu, Tuğba and others},
title = {{Validity and Reliability Study of Online Cognitive Tracking Software (BEYNEX)}},
journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.3233/adr-230117},
pmid = {38405342},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3233/adr-230117}
}