Home › Research › Drug development
Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease in the View of Diabetes Mellitus
Yasumasa Ohyagi, Katsue Miyoshi, Norimichi Nakamura. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2019
Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet
Recently, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is understood as "diabetes of the brain" or "type 3 diabetes." Recent clinical trials of anti-amyloid β-protein (Aβ) therapies have not proved to be successful. Thus, glucose-insulin metabolism in the brain is thought to be an alternative therapeutic target. Various types of antidiabetic drugs such as insulin, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, biguanides, and others have been reported to be effective on cognitive impairment in animal models and patients with DM or AD. Here, recent reports are reviewed. While we identified apomorphine (APO) as a novel drug that promoted intracellular Aβ degradation and improved memory function in an AD mouse model, more recently, we have revealed that APO treatment improves neuronal insulin resistance and activates insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), a major Aβ-degrading enzyme. In this context, recovery of impaired insulin signaling in AD neurons may be a promising therapeutic strategy for AD dementia.
Key findings
- While we identified apomorphine (APO) as a novel drug that promoted intracellular Aβ degradation and improved memory function in an AD mouse model, more recently, we have revealed that APO treatment improves neuronal insulin resistance and activates insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), a major Aβ-degrading enzyme.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Advances in experimental medicine and biology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31062332) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Ohyagi, Y., Miyoshi, K., & Nakamura, N. (2019). Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease in the View of Diabetes Mellitus. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3540-2_11
Vancouver
Ohyagi Y, Miyoshi K, Nakamura N. Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease in the View of Diabetes Mellitus. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2019. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3540-2_11. PMID: 31062332.
BibTeX
@article{ohyagi2019-31062332,
author = {Ohyagi, Yasumasa and Miyoshi, Katsue and Nakamura, Norimichi},
title = {{Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease in the View of Diabetes Mellitus}},
journal = {Advances in experimental medicine and biology},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1007/978-981-13-3540-2_11},
pmid = {31062332},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3540-2_11}
}
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “agonists”
285 studies in the library carry the topic tag “agonists”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 285 tagged studies.