Home › Research › Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
The neurobiologic consequences of Down syndrome
Coyle JT, Oster-Granite ML, Gearhart JD.. Brain research bulletin, 1986-06-01
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Trisomy of the whole or distal part of human chromosome 21 (HSA 21) (Ts21) results in Down Syndrome (DS), which is characterized in part by mental retardation and associated neurological abnormalities. Structural abnormalities observed frequently include reduced brain weight, decreased number and depth of sulci in the cerebral cortices, neuronal heterotopias, and reduced numbers of specific populations of neurons, such as granule cells, in the cerebral cortices. Abnormalities in the structure of cells, primarily of the dendrites, are observed in portions of the neuraxis, such as the hippocampus, cerebellum, and cerebral cortices. Functional abnormalities in membrane properties in peripheral structures and in neurotransmitter enzyme systems in both peripheral and central structures are observed also. Brains of DS individuals over the age of 40 exhibit the characteristic neuropathologic and neurochemical stigmata of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The cholinergic and noradrenergic systems appear to be particularly vulnerable. To elucidate the mechanisms responsible for these abnormalities, identification of the genes located in the distal part of HSA 21 and the systematic study of animal model systems with close genetic homology are essential.
Key findings
- Trisomy of the whole or distal part of human chromosome 21 (HSA 21) (Ts21) results in Down Syndrome (DS), which is characterized in part by mental retardation and associated neurological abnormalities.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Brain research bulletin) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1986 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 2875770) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Coyle, J. T., Oster-Granite, M. L., & Gearhart, J. D. (1986). The neurobiologic consequences of Down syndrome. Brain research bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(86)90074-2
Vancouver
Coyle JT, Oster-Granite ML, Gearhart JD. The neurobiologic consequences of Down syndrome. Brain research bulletin. 1986. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(86)90074-2. PMID: 2875770.
BibTeX
@article{coyle1986-2875770,
author = {Coyle, J. T. and Oster-Granite, M. L. and Gearhart, J. D.},
title = {{The neurobiologic consequences of Down syndrome}},
journal = {Brain research bulletin},
year = {1986},
doi = {10.1016/0361-9230(86)90074-2},
pmid = {2875770},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(86)90074-2}
}
Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Also tagged “dosage”
80 studies in the library carry the topic tag “dosage”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 80 tagged studies.