Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The growing morbidity, mortality, and health care costs related to heart failure (HF) underscore the urgent need to prioritize its primary prevention. Whereas a risk-based approach for HF prevention remains in its infancy, several key opportunities exist to actualize this paradigm in clinical practice. First, the 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America HF guidelines provided recommendations, for the first time, on the clinical utility of multivariable risk equations to estimate risk of incident HF. Second, the American Heart Association recently developed the PREVENT (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events) equations, which not only enable prediction of incident HF separately, but also include HF in the prediction of total cardiovascular disease. Third, the predominant phenotype of HF risk has emerged as the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Fourth, the emergence of novel therapies that prevent incident HF (eg, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) and target multiple cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic axes demonstrate growing potential for risk-based interventions. Whereas the concept of risk-based prevention has been established for decades, it has only been operationalized for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention to date. Translating these opportunities into a conceptual framework of risk-based primary prevention of HF requires implementation of PREVENT-HF (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events-Heart Failure) equations, targeted use of cardiac biomarkers (eg, natriuretic peptides) and echocardiography for risk reclassification and earlier detection of pre-HF, and definition of therapy-specific risk thresholds that incorporate net benefit and cost-effectiveness. This scientific statement reviews the current evidence for accurate risk prediction, defines strategies for equitable prevention, and proposes potential strategies for the successful implementation of risk-based primary prevention of HF.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Khan, S. S., Breathett, K. K., Braun, L. T., Chow, S. L., Gupta, D. K., Lekavich, C. L., et al. (2025). Risk-Based Primary Prevention of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001307

Vancouver

Khan SS, Breathett KK, Braun LT, Chow SL, Gupta DK, Lekavich CL, et al. Risk-Based Primary Prevention of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001307. PMID: 40235437.

BibTeX

@article{khan2025-40235437,
  author  = {Khan, Sadiya S. and Breathett, Khadijah K and Braun, Lynne T. and Chow, Sheryl L. and Gupta, Deepak K. and Lekavich, Carolyn L. and Lloyd‐Jones, Donald M. and Ndumele, Chiadi E. and others},
  title   = {{Risk-Based Primary Prevention of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association}},
  journal = {Circulation},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1161/cir.0000000000001307},
  pmid    = {40235437},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001307}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This American Heart Association statement is about risk-based primary prevention of heart failure, including risk equations and therapies such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. It does not address Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 48 of the 97 points it could be judged on, which is 49 of 100. Total 49 of 100.48 of the 97 points we could judge = 49 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on institution's track record, so that was left out: it earned 48 of the 97 points we could judge it on, which is 49 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Circulation)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Circulation: journal h-index 848 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 71 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 23.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 45.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 71 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Larry A. Allen: h-index 81 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40235437)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 48 / 97 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 48 of the 97 points we could judge it on is 49 out of 100.
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also in Prevention and risk

265 studies in the library are filed under Prevention and risk with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Prevention and risk hub.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →