Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Synapse loss occurs early in prion disease, yet the intracellular signaling driving this dysregulation remains poorly understood. Evidence of neuronal hyperactivity was reported in humans with sporadic and familial CJD as well as in the early stages of prion disease in mice (strain 22L). Here we perform a time course study of prion-infected mice (strain RML) and show an increase in the immediate-early gene, Arc , suggesting this is a conserved response to prions. We also observed a persistent decrease in phosphatase abundance (PP1α and PP2B) in the cerebral cortex starting at the earliest timepoint (preclinical). At this stage, mGluR5 dimers and phosphorylated AMPA receptors were increased. By clinical disease onset, mGluR5 dimers declined and activity shifted toward NMDA receptor activation, marked by GluN2B hyperphosphorylation. Together, these findings suggest that early phosphatase reduction accompanies neuronal hyperactivity, and precedes substantial inflammation. Elucidating the mechanisms driving this early phosphatase loss and its role in neuronal hyperactivity may reveal novel therapeutic targets for prion disease. Significance statement Synapse loss and neuronal hyperactivity are early features of prion and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet the underlying molecular drivers remain poorly understood. In the current time course study, we reveal elevated levels of neuronal activity protein, Arc, at early, mid, and late timepoints of prion disease. Concurrently, we reveal a persistent and early reduction in key phosphatases (PP1α and PP2B). Additionally, we observed hyperphosphorylation of glutamatergic receptors starting from subclinical stages, before overt neuroinflammation or neuronal loss occur. Furthermore, we uncover a disease-stage-dependent transition from early AMPAR/mGluR5 alterations to late-stage NMDAR involvement. Understanding the mechanisms driving early phosphatase loss and neuronal hyperactivity could reveal novel therapeutic targets for prion disease.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 13 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 21 of 100. Raw total 21 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 21 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 13 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100.
Total 21 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Rajic, A. J., Ojeda-Juarez, D., Sarkar, D., Sumowski, P., Flores, S., Pourhamzeh, M., et al. (2026). Reduced phosphatases and hyperphosphorylated glutamatergic receptors persist from early to late stages of prion disease. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.14.751571

Vancouver

Rajic AJ, Ojeda-Juarez D, Sarkar D, Sumowski P, Flores S, Pourhamzeh M, et al. Reduced phosphatases and hyperphosphorylated glutamatergic receptors persist from early to late stages of prion disease. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.10.14.751571.

BibTeX

@article{rajic2026-c51e2b7b,
  author  = {Rajic, A. J. and Ojeda-Juarez, D. and Sarkar, D. and Sumowski, P. and Flores, S. and Pourhamzeh, M. and Soldau, K. and Pizzo, D. P. and others},
  title   = {{Reduced phosphatases and hyperphosphorylated glutamatergic receptors persist from early to late stages of prion disease}},
  journal = {bioRxiv},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.10.14.751571},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.14.751571}
}

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →