Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the primary cause of dementia in older individuals, exhibiting an increasing incidence worldwide. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control has been receiving attention in the pathology of AD. The accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER will activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), leading to cellular apoptosis. Using a mouse model of 5xFAD, we found that physical exercise (PE) promoted the clearance of ER fragments and inhibited the ER stress via ER autophagy (ER - Phagy). As a result, physical exercise reduced Aβ deposition, inhibited the neuronal apoptosis, ameliorated the emotional and cognitive impairments. Mechanistically, these PE related effects may be linked to the increased FAM134B, an ER-Phagy receptor, by up-regulating neuronal progranulin (Pgrn). Recombinant Pgrn injection could mimic the protective effects of PE, whereas down-regulation of Pgrn could abolish the PE-associated protection. Our findings indicate that physical exercise, as a readily accessible lifestyle intervention, holds significant potential for preventing diseases related to the global aging population.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Li, L., Li, S., Cai, L., Yang, X., Feng, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2025). Physical exercise mitigates the cognitive impairments by promoting ER-phagy in mice model of Alzheimer's disease. Behavioural brain research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115650

Vancouver

Li L, Li S, Cai L, Yang X, Feng Y, Zhang L, et al. Physical exercise mitigates the cognitive impairments by promoting ER-phagy in mice model of Alzheimer's disease. Behavioural brain research. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115650. PMID: 40414310.

BibTeX

@article{li2025-40414310,
  author  = {Li, Lili and Li, Shiyin and Cai, Lei and Yang, Xiaofeng and Feng, Yifeng and Zhang, Liying and He, Xiaofei and Li, Mingyue},
  title   = {{Physical exercise mitigates the cognitive impairments by promoting ER-phagy in mice model of Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Behavioural brain research},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115650},
  pmid    = {40414310},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115650}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 24 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.24 of the 56 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Behavioural brain research)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mice”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40414310)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 24 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “autophagy”

240 studies in the library carry the topic tag “autophagy”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 240 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →