Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Introduction Nutritional knowledge is a recognized determinant of dietary behaviors, though its impact may vary with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. To capture such interactions and population variability, advanced methods like moderation and latent class analyses are needed. This study aimed to examine the relationship between nutritional knowledge and diet quality among Polish adults, accounting for socioeconomic determinants, and to identify subgroups at risk of poorer dietary patterns. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from two nationally representative surveys (2017–2020), totaling 4,000 adults. Nutritional knowledge was measured with the validated KomPAN questionnaire, and diet quality was assessed with the Diet Quality Index (DQI). Associations were tested via linear regression, moderation analysis explored interactions between knowledge and demographics, and latent class analysis (LCA) identified dietary lifestyle subgroups. Results The mean DQI score was −0.79 (SD = 13.40). Higher nutritional knowledge (β = 0.87, p < 0.001) and higher education were positively associated with diet quality. Women and older adults had better diets; smoking and alcohol consumption were linked to poorer outcomes. Multivariate models confirmed nutritional knowledge, sex, and age as independent predictors. The beneficial effect of knowledge was weaker in older adults (β = −0.49, p < 0.001). LCA revealed three profiles; the poorest diets occurred among younger men with low knowledge and unhealthy behaviors, and younger adults with higher socioeconomic status. Conclusion Nutritional knowledge supports better diet quality but may not suffice especially in older adults. Tailored public health strategies are needed for vulnerable groups, including younger men with low knowledge and those with higher socioeconomic status but poor diets.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study examined nutritional knowledge and diet quality in Polish adults, not Alzheimer's disease, so it provides no information on treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's. It found that higher nutritional knowledge and education were linked to better diet quality.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Public Health)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Public Health: journal h-index 174 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 4,000 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 13 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 11.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 13 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Iwona Traczyk: h-index 24 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Medical University of Warsaw: institution h-index 348 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40917426)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kucharska, A., Sińska, B. I., Pańczyk, M., Samel‐Kowalik, P., Raciborski, F., Czerwonogrodzka–Senczyna, A., et al. (2025). Nutritional knowledge, sociodemographic, and lifestyle factors as determinants of diet quality – a Polish population-based study. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613598

Vancouver

Kucharska A, Sińska BI, Pańczyk M, Samel‐Kowalik P, Raciborski F, Czerwonogrodzka–Senczyna A, et al. Nutritional knowledge, sociodemographic, and lifestyle factors as determinants of diet quality – a Polish population-based study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2025. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613598. PMID: 40917426.

BibTeX

@article{kucharska2025-40917426,
  author  = {Kucharska, Alicja and Sińska, Beata Irena and Pańczyk, Mariusz and Samel‐Kowalik, Piotr and Raciborski, Filip and Czerwonogrodzka–Senczyna, Aneta and Boniecka, Iwona and Traczyk, Iwona},
  title   = {{Nutritional knowledge, sociodemographic, and lifestyle factors as determinants of diet quality – a Polish population-based study}},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613598},
  pmid    = {40917426},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613598}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also in Prevention and risk

265 studies in the library are filed under Prevention and risk with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Prevention and risk hub.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →