Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Impairments in activities of daily living (ADL) are common clinical symptoms of human Alzheimer's disease (AD). Describing the ADL in AD animal models might provide more insights into the mechanism/treatment of the disease. Here, we demonstrated that the forebrain presenilin 1(Psen1)/presenilin 2 (Psen2) conditional double knockout (DKO) mice exhibited deficits in nest building, marble burying and food burrowing starting at 3 months old and worsening at later ages. At 4 months of age, spontaneous activities in the home cage were also impaired in DKO mice, including physically demanding activities, habituation-like behaviors, and nourishment behaviors during the first two hours in the dark phase. These results indicated that loss of function of Psen1 and Psen2 in mice impaired a series of noncognitive behaviors in the early phase of neurodegeneration. This observation suggests that DKO mice are an ideal model for further mechanistic studies of Psen1 and Psen2 functions in regulating noncognitive behaviors.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 23 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.23 of the 56 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Behavioural brain research)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mice”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34758364)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 23 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Si, Y., Guo, C., Xiao, F., Mei, B., & Meng, B. (2022). Noncognitive species-typical and home-cage behavioral alterations in conditional presenilin 1/presenilin 2 double knockout mice. Behavioural brain research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113652

Vancouver

Si Y, Guo C, Xiao F, Mei B, Meng B. Noncognitive species-typical and home-cage behavioral alterations in conditional presenilin 1/presenilin 2 double knockout mice. Behavioural brain research. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113652. PMID: 34758364.

BibTeX

@article{si2022-34758364,
  author  = {Si, Youwen and Guo, Chao and Xiao, Fan and Mei, Bing and Meng, Bo},
  title   = {{Noncognitive species-typical and home-cage behavioral alterations in conditional presenilin 1/presenilin 2 double knockout mice}},
  journal = {Behavioural brain research},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113652},
  pmid    = {34758364},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113652}
}

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also tagged “dendritic”

287 studies in the library carry the topic tag “dendritic”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 287 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →