Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a global problem affecting 58 million people, expected to reach a prevalence of 88 million people by 2050. The disease affects the brain, memory, cognition, language, and motor movement. Many interventions have sought to improve memory and cognition. mHealth and virtual reality (VR) are two such interventions. To analyze studies from the last 10 years with older adults with AD to ascertain the effectiveness of telehealth techniques such as mHealth and VR for memory care. In accordance with the Kruse Protocol and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020, five reviewers searched four research databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect) on 3 August 2022 for studies with strong methodologies that fit the objective statement. Twenty-two studies from 13 countries were analyzed for trends. Four interventions (mHealth/eHealth, VR, mHealth + VR, game console, and telephone) used RCT, quasi-experimental, pre-post, observational, and mixed methods. These interventions improved cognition, memory, brain activity, language, depression, attention, vitality, quality of life, cortical atrophy, cerebral blood flow, neuro plasticity, and mental health. Only three interventions reported either no improvements or no statistically significant improvements. Cost, time, training, and low reimbursement were barriers to the adoption of these interventions. mHealth and VR offer interventions with positive effectiveness for memory care for AD. The long-term effect of this improvement is unclear. Additional research is needed in this area to establish clinical practice guidelines.

Key findings

Why it matters

This systematic review found that mHealth and virtual reality interventions improved cognition, memory, and other outcomes in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, though three interventions reported no improvements or no statistically significant improvements. It reviews technology-based cognitive interventions, not a cure or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 30 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.30 of the 96 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland))
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Healthcare: journal h-index 120 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 15 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.5 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 12 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Texas State University: institution h-index 260 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36292292)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 30 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Scott, K. C., Keya, S., Valery, A., Nicole, H., & Rebekah, B. (2022). Leveraging mHealth and Virtual Reality to Improve Cognition for Alzheimer's Patients: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101845

Vancouver

Scott KC, Keya S, Valery A, Nicole H, Rebekah B. Leveraging mHealth and Virtual Reality to Improve Cognition for Alzheimer's Patients: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2022. doi:10.3390/healthcare10101845. PMID: 36292292.

BibTeX

@article{scott2022-36292292,
  author  = {Scott, Kruse Clemens and Keya, Sen and Valery, Armenta and Nicole, Hubbard and Rebekah, Brooks},
  title   = {{Leveraging mHealth and Virtual Reality to Improve Cognition for Alzheimer's Patients: A Systematic Review}},
  journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.3390/healthcare10101845},
  pmid    = {36292292},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101845}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also in Health systems and care delivery

172 studies in the library are filed under Health systems and care delivery with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Health systems and care delivery hub.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →