Home › Research › Disease mechanisms
Evidence for altered LRP/RAGE expression in Alzheimer lesion pathogenesis
Jeynes B, Provias J.. Current Alzheimer research, 2008-10-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
There is significant evidence to suggest that a damaged or dysfunctional blood-brain barrier (BBB) may contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) lesions. Lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP-1) and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) are known to be important (BBB) capillary transport proteins. Altered expression of either of these capillary endothelial LRP-1 and RAGE receptor proteins could indicate a dysfunction of the BBB and its transport regulation of beta-amyloid (Abeta). Cortical samples from the superior temporal (ST) and calcarine occipital (COC) cortices of ten confirmed AD brains and ten comparison group (CG) brains were examined. The densities of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), senile plaques (SPs) and LRP-1 and RAGE positive capillaries were recorded and statistically analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference between AD and CG cases and the densities of LRP-1 and RAGE positive capillaries, the AD cases demonstrating the greater numbers. Further, in AD brains there were significant negative correlations between the Abeta burden of SPs and both LRP-1 and RAGE-positive capillaries [p < .001]. Additionally, there was a strong positive correlation between LRP-1 and RAGE capillaries in AD brains [p < .001]. These results suggest that alterations in the LRP-1 and RAGE mediated transport of Abeta take place in AD brains in lesion prone regions and may therefore contribute to SP lesion pathogenesis.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Jeynes, B., & Provias, J. (2008). Evidence for altered LRP/RAGE expression in Alzheimer lesion pathogenesis. Current Alzheimer research. https://doi.org/10.2174/156720508785908937
Vancouver
Jeynes B, Provias J. Evidence for altered LRP/RAGE expression in Alzheimer lesion pathogenesis. Current Alzheimer research. 2008. doi:10.2174/156720508785908937. PMID: 18855584.
BibTeX
@article{jeynes2008-18855584,
author = {Jeynes, B. and Provias, J.},
title = {{Evidence for altered LRP/RAGE expression in Alzheimer lesion pathogenesis}},
journal = {Current Alzheimer research},
year = {2008},
doi = {10.2174/156720508785908937},
pmid = {18855584},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2174/156720508785908937}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- There is significant evidence to suggest that a damaged or dysfunctional blood-brain barrier (BBB) may contribute to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) lesions.
- There was a statistically significant difference between AD and CG cases and the densities of LRP-1 and RAGE positive capillaries, the AD cases demonstrating the greater numbers.
- Further, in AD brains there were significant negative correlations between the Abeta burden of SPs and both LRP-1 and RAGE-positive capillaries [p < .001].
- These results suggest that alterations in the LRP-1 and RAGE mediated transport of Abeta take place in AD brains in lesion prone regions and may therefore contribute to SP lesion pathogenesis.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Current Alzheimer research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2008 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 18855584) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Disease mechanisms
Also tagged “precursor”
1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.