Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The repeated inability of Aβ therapies to pass clinical tests in sporadic AD points to the complexity of the disease and indicates that earlier or more interventions could be necessary. Results:CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in genes associated with AD, APP, PSEN1, BACE1, and APOE4 was very effective in mitigating β-amyloid deposition, decreasing tau hyperphosphorylation, and improving neuronal function in vivo and in vitro. Efficient delivery through viral and non-viral vectors demonstrated precise gene modification with low off-targeting, with high specificity reported in neuronal cells. Studies on functional outcomes in animal models of AD showed improved learning and memory performance, which was associated with reduced amyloid plaque burden and neuroinflammation. These findings demonstrate not only that CRISPR/Cas9 affects core pathogenic pathways but also that it is translatable to measurable cognitive enhancement, an indication of potential as a disease-modifying therapy.

Key findings

Why it matters

This describes a hypothetical therapeutic framework, not a tested treatment in people, so it does not show that CRISPR/Cas9 can treat or prevent Alzheimer's in patients. It reports that gene editing reduced amyloid and tau and improved learning and memory in animal and cell models, which is early evidence only.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 25 of the 64 points it could be judged on, which is 39 of 100. Total 39 of 100.25 of the 64 points we could judge = 39 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 64 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 25 / 64 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 64 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100.
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Karim, M. A., Meem, S. P., & Azad, A. K. (2025). CRISPR–Cas9–Mediated Genetic Correction for Alzheimer's Disease A Hypothetical Therapeutic Framework. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18032008

Vancouver

Karim MA, Meem SP, Azad AK. CRISPR–Cas9–Mediated Genetic Correction for Alzheimer's Disease A Hypothetical Therapeutic Framework. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18032008.

BibTeX

@article{karim2025-a93d1dcb,
  author  = {Karim, Md Asif and Meem, Sohana Parveen and Azad, Abdul Kalam},
  title   = {{CRISPR–Cas9–Mediated Genetic Correction for Alzheimer's Disease A Hypothetical Therapeutic Framework}},
  journal = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.5281/zenodo.18032008},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18032008}
}

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also in Risk genes beyond APOE

98 studies in the library are filed under Risk genes beyond APOE with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk genes beyond APOE hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →