Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. TREM2 and immune genetics

Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is characterized by marked biological heterogeneity, only partly explained by the frequent presence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) copathology. Whether microglial responses contribute to this heterogeneity and how they are modulated by APOE genotype remain poorly understood. Using a specific immunoassay targeting cleaved soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), we investigated TREM2-dependent microglial responses across two independent DLB cohorts (n = 129) with molecular biomarker profiling and longitudinal follow-up. sTREM2 showed stage-dependent associations with AD-related biomarkers, being associated with amyloid-related changes during prodromal DLB and predominantly to tau-related markers at dementia stage. APOEε4 carriers exhibited approximately two-fold lower sTREM2 levels than non-carriers specifically during prodromal DLB, independently of AD copathology, with more pronounced effects observed in women. Longitudinal analyses showed that higher baseline sTREM2 levels during prodromal DLB were associated with slower cognitive decline independently of AD-related biomarkers. These findings suggest that APOEε4 attenuates early TREM2-mediated microglial responses in DLB through mechanisms beyond AD copathology. Together, our results identify the APOE–TREM2 axis as a potential contributor to disease heterogeneity and support stage-specific, biomarker-guided therapeutic strategies targeting TREM2 signaling in Lewy body disorders.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Rodríguez, E. M., Zaragoza-Ballester, P., Alcolea, D., Esteller-Gauxax, D., Nuscher, B., Chacón, S., et al. (2026). APOEε4 attenuates early TREM2-mediated microglial responses and influences disease trajectories in dementia with Lewy bodies. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10429506/v1

Vancouver

Rodríguez EM, Zaragoza-Ballester P, Alcolea D, Esteller-Gauxax D, Nuscher B, Chacón S, et al. APOEε4 attenuates early TREM2-mediated microglial responses and influences disease trajectories in dementia with Lewy bodies. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10429506/v1.

BibTeX

@article{rodriguez2026-ef1dd141,
  author  = {Rodríguez, E. M. and Zaragoza-Ballester, P. and Alcolea, D. and Esteller-Gauxax, D. and Nuscher, B. and Chacón, S. and Á, Fernández-León and Í, Rodríguez-Baz and others},
  title   = {{APOEε4 attenuates early TREM2-mediated microglial responses and influences disease trajectories in dementia with Lewy bodies}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10429506/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10429506/v1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 27 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 44 of 100. Raw total 44 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 44 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 44 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 44 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 129 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 27 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 44 out of 100.
Total 44 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in TREM2 and immune genetics

Also tagged “expressed”

384 studies in the library carry the topic tag “expressed”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 384 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on TREM2 and immune genetics

See all studies in TREM2 and immune genetics →