You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 2,176–2,200 of 3,821 studies published 2025(page 88 of 153)· 27,380 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)
From OpenAlex; 12,859 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·AIMS microbiology·2025-07-08
The gut microbiome plays a significant role in regulating gastrointestinal (GI) function and modulating the gut-brain axis, which describes the bidirectional communication between the GI tract and the central nervous system (CNS). 1 key finding →
Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a vascular disorder that increases the risk of stroke and dementia and is diagnosed through brain MRI. 5 key findings →
With our focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), the authors herein provided a comprehensive overview of impaired amyloid beta and tau clearance pathways observed through advanced neuroimaging techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, arterial spin labeling, phase contrast MR imaging, PET, and functional MR imaging. 2 key findings →
Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is the most common cause of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) and highly associated with Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. 3 key findings →
Though usually described as isolated models, neurodegenerative diseases exist in a significant proportion of cases as mixed pathologies, particularly in older adults. 1 key finding →
Neurodegenerative diseases have long been considered distinct proteinopathies: amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer's disease, α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease, and TDP-43 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·Cell reports·2025-04-07
Impaired neuronal and synaptic function are hallmarks of early Alzheimer's disease (AD), preceding other neuropathological traits and cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by progressive cognitive decline driven by a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. 5 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder among the elderly, with limited effective treatments available in clinical practice. 4 key findings →
In the present study, we demonstrate that Interferon Regulatory Factor-1 (IRF-1), which is deficient in the brain of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD), negatively regulates the O-GlcNAcylation levels of GluN1 through transcriptional regulation of the human OGA gene. 3 key findings →
Deposition of abnormally phosphorylated tau aggregates is a central event leading to neuronal dysfunction and death in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other tauopathies. 4 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide, and there are still no strategies to slow or prevent its clinical progression. 1 key finding →
SUMOylation, a reversible post-translational modification, regulates various mitochondrial processes, including biogenesis, dynamics, mitophagy, and the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·Aging and disease·2025-11-25
Cellular senescence, once considered a protective mechanism against oncogenesis, is now recognized as a key driver of aging and age-related diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·Science advances·2025-10-10
Age-related proteinopathies, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, are driven by toxic accumulation of misfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that overwhelm cellular proteostasis. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·Cells·2025-06-16
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by neuronal loss, cognitive decline, and pathological hallmarks such as amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. 1 key finding →
The employed family caregivers juggle caregiving and work responsibilities constantly, highlighting a growing concern for their financial and professional well-being. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100.·Home healthcare now·2025-07-07
Alzheimer's disease and other dementias are expected to affect millions of individuals in the coming decades, placing a growing burden on healthcare systems, families, and caregivers. 5 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.