Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology is increasingly recognized to manifest in the retina, offering a non-invasive window for early biomarker discovery. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 40 Evidence: moderate

Opposing Regulation of Tau Condensation by Phosphorylation Levels and Molecular Chaperone Interactions

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-30

Aggregation of the microtubule-stabilizing protein Tau into insoluble deposits is characteristic for several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disease in the world, is caused by a variety of factors that lead to neuronal injury and an alteration in neurotransmitter production and release. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

In this cohort, APOE ε4 carrier status was related to disease severity at baseline rather than to the rate of cognitive decline over 80 weeks. 3 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Participants: 370 Evidence: moderate

Brain-resident myeloid cells promote rapid leukocyte adhesion in leptomeningeal vessels after anti-Aβ immunotherapy

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-11

Anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) immunotherapy improves cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but is associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), through poorly understood mechanisms. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

CSF Aβ42 rose from 526.0 to 1053.0 pg/mL (+ 100.2%), total tau (t-tau) fell from 578.2 to 278.0 pg/mL(-51.9%), and phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) fell from 90.8 to 23.1 pg/mL(-74.6%). 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer’s disease disrupts large-scale brain networks before cognitive symptoms emerge, yet the mechanisms underlying this progression remain unclear. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Effectiveness of Modern Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions for Major Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-12

From 464 identified records, 30 peer-reviewed primary studies met all eligibility criteria following the exclusion of low-quality sources and unindexed preprints. 3 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high

Amyloid plaques, one of the defining features of Alzheimer’s disease, are associated with synapse loss and accumulation of pathological tau in dystrophic neurites and reactive glia in their immediate vicinity. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer’s Disease: Evidence Maturity and Clinical Translation Across the Care Pathway

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2026-07-30

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now a credible translational research platform across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathway, but its clinical value is often difficult to judge from performance metrics alone. 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

A major obstacle to effective Alzheimer’s disease therapy is the limited ability to deliver therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Distinct PTMs delineate the compartment-specific architectural signatures of Aβ deposits. 2 key findings →

Participants: 19 Evidence: low

Real-World Characterization of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) in Lecanemab Treatment at an Academic Health System

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-01-25

The overall incidence of any ARIA was 25.2%, with ARIA-H occurring in 22.4% of patients and ARIA-E in 12.2%. 3 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 468 Evidence: moderate

MCH-Guard offers a flexible clinical decision-support tool for optimizing spontaneous MCH & ARIA surveillance. 1 key finding →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 813 Evidence: moderate

Temporal imaging variables may provide independent prognostic information beyond baseline risk, supporting a dynamic model of haemorrhagic risk in Alzheimer’s disease. 2 key findings →

Participants: 1,069 Evidence: low

We trained a self-configuring nnU-Net model for CMB segmentation in a hetero-geneous multicenter sample ( n =264), including 1.5T and 3T field strengths, SWI and T2*-GRE sequences, and community and clinical cohorts. 1 key finding →

Participants: 264 Evidence: low

Intravenous anti-Aβ immunotherapy acutely increases cerebral amyloid angiopathy and vascular damages in APOE4 mice

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-02-11

Anti-Aβ immunotherapies for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) have high rates of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), an adverse side effect with markedly higher rates in APOE4 carriers. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Under calibrated simulation parameters, slowing of cognitive decline emerged as the most important attribute (relative importance 25.7%), followed by annual cost (17.6%), ARIA risk (15.4%), and travel to treatment centre (13.0%). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Simulation-based validation demonstrates the framework’s analytical capability. 5 key findings →

Design: systematic review Evidence: high

Progranulin deficiency promotes neuroinflammation through cathepsin B-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-13

Haploinsufficiency of progranulin (resulting from mutations in the GRN gene) is a major genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), which is characterized by profound changes in personality and behavior, progressive impairments in executive function, speech, language and/or movement, TDP-43 pathology, lysosomal dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Electrochemical biosensors offer a promising route for the rapid, non-invasive detection of disease biomarkers by converting biochemical interactions into measurable electrical signals. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Alzheimer's Disease as the Result of Aberrant Reactivation of Embryonic Brain Pathways Silenced Decades Earlier

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-07-22

These findings shift AD modeling from passive proteotoxicity to an active, misregulated developmental structural engine, offering a mechanical framework that explains early olfactory vulnerability and non-linear anti-tau clinical trial responses. 3 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed