You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 1,401–1,425 of 1,426 studies scoring ≤ 29 out of 100 (page 57 of 58)· 27,380 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
From OpenAlex; 12,859 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
Social isolation and loneliness are associated with significant negative impacts on mental and physical health, including heart disease, stroke, depression, cancer, and dementia. 3 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 15 out of 100.·Not indexed·2026
Problem Definition: Grocery retailers increasingly fulfil online orders from existing stores rather than from dark stores (dedicated warehouses/fulfilment centers). 3 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 15 out of 100.·Not indexed·2024
In today’s fast-changing business environment, it’s extremely important to be able to respond to client needs in the most effective and timely manner. 5 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 15 out of 100.·Not indexed·2026
Medicare and Medicaid provide health coverage to millions of Americans, including older adults, people with disabilities, low-income families, children, and individuals with complex medical and social needs. 1 key finding →
Our study suggests that although ED staff expressed confidence regarding symptom management in palliative care, they lacked understanding of the patients in whom a palliative approach could be applied and sought further education in areas, such as end-of-life communication and ethical issues. 2 key findings →
Intravenous neuronal tau-targeted T807-modified novel biomimetic nanosystems are a promising clinical candidate for the treatment of AD. 3 key findings →
The FDA converted lecanemab (Leqembi) from accelerated to full traditional approval after the Phase 3 Clarity AD trial (1,795 patients) confirmed it slowed cognitive decline, making it the first amyloid-targeting antibody to reach full approval for Alzheimer's. The drug carries a boxed warning for ARIA, brain swelling or bleeding that is usually detected on routine MRI and is more common in people with two copies of the ApoE ε4 gene or those on blood thinners. 3 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 13 out of 100.·Not indexed·2015
Existing literature analyzing the choice of received long-term care by frail elderly (65 years) predominantly focuses on physical and psychological conditions of elderly people as factors that influence the decision for a particular type of care. 1 key finding →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 13 out of 100.·Nature communications·2013-01-01
Pericytes are cells in the blood-brain barrier that degenerate in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurological disorder associated with neurovascular dysfunction, abnormal elevation of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ), tau pathology and neuronal loss. 2 key findings →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 12 out of 100.·PLOS ONE·2022-03-30
Following an anonymous 2021 whistleblower petition to the FDA alleging manipulated research underlying the Alzheimer's drug simufilam, PLOS ONE conducted its own investigation and retracted five papers co-authored by Hoau-Yan Wang, some of them co-authored with a Cassava Sciences executive, after finding that background patterns in blot images appeared 'more similar than would be expected for data obtained in independent experiments.' 5 key findings →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 12 out of 100.·Not indexed·2015
I develop a dynamic oligopoly model to study the evolution of retail grocery: Grocery chains expand at the expense of independent local stores. 1 key finding →
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 12 out of 100.·Not indexed·2023
This study aims to test a model that investigates the impact of self-store image congruency on the in-store shopping experience in the context of grocery retail setting, which in turn, explain and predict different facets of consumer behavior, including consumer satisfaction, consumer engagement, and store attachment. 3 key findings →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 12 out of 100.·Aging·2020-01-06
Our pre-experiments found that the brain circRNA sequence profiles and gut microbiota in AD-like mice were changed, as circNF1-419 could enhance autophagy to ameliorate senile dementia in AD-like mice, so we conclude that there might some connections between circRNA and gut microbiome. 3 key findings →
⚠ Press release — not a studyalzhub usefulness score 11 out of 100.·Biogen Inc. press release·2024-01-31
On January 31, 2024, Biogen announced it would discontinue development and sales of Aduhelm (aducanumab) and end the mandatory post-approval ENVISION confirmatory trial, redirecting resources to lecanemab (Leqembi) and other pipeline drugs, including two tau-targeting compounds (BIIB080, BIIB113). 3 key findings →
CMS's national policy covers FDA-approved anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (such as lecanemab and donanemab) for Medicare patients with a documented diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's dementia and confirmed amyloid pathology, under a framework called 'Coverage with Evidence Development.' 3 key findings →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 10 out of 100.·Nature·2009-02-01
Naturally occurring axonal pruning and neuronal cell death help to sculpt neuronal connections during development, but their mechanistic basis remains poorly understood. 1 key finding →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 10 out of 100.·Nature·2006-03-01
Memory function often declines with age, and is believed to deteriorate initially because of changes in synaptic function rather than loss of neurons. 2 key findings →
⚠ Retracted — do not rely on italzhub usefulness score 10 out of 100.·Nature·2013-07-24
Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk is strongly influenced by genetic factors such as the presence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (referred to here as APOE4), as well as non-genetic determinants including ageing. 1 key finding →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.