Alzheimer's disease (AD) disproportionately affects certain racial and ethnic subgroups, such as African American/Black and Hispanic adults. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) disproportionately affects certain racial and ethnic subgroups, such as African American/Black and Hispanic adults. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overly restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria can reduce generalizability, slow enrollment, and disproportionately exclude historically underrepresented populations. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients had a mean age of 70.4 (±6.6) years and 97.8% were men. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Participants indicated skepticism regarding the use of precision medicine in their communities. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found that four items-a Medicare claim recording ADRD 1 year ago, 2 years ago, 3 years ago, and a total stay of 6 months in a nursing home-exhibit a pattern of association consistent with a single underlying ADRD construct, and presence of any two of these four items predict a direct measure of cognitive function and also future claims for ADRD. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The results of the simulations show that by prolonging the length of a person's 'stay' in the Mild, Moderate, or Severe stage, the total cost of care for all persons with AD will increase by 2080. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Out-of-pocket costs of dementia care were collected via a web-based weekly survey for up to 18 months. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We examined how methods used for identifying dementia in administrative claims affected dementia incidence across racial/ethnic populations using a 100% sample of Medicare beneficiaries (n = 23,793,452). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Proteins exist as diverse proteoforms resulting from a combination of genetic variation, alternative splicing, and post-translational modifications. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Filamentous tau inclusions in neurons and glia are neuropathological hallmarks of sporadic and familial tauopathies. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We conclude with an interdependent list of challenges that must be collaboratively addressed before these endpoints are widely adopted. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Early detection and timely intervention play a vital role in the effective management of Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We quantified the amount of amyloid beta-peptide (Abeta) immunoreactivity as well as amyloid deposits in a large cohort of transgenic mice overexpressing the V717F human amyloid precursor protein (APP(V717F+/-) TG mice) with no, one, or two mouse apolipoprotein E (Apoe) alleles at various ages. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Human γ-secretase is an intra-membrane protease that cleaves many different substrates. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
After the authors controlled for demographic characteristics and dementia severity, both estimates of premorbid intellectual ability were inversely correlated with cerebral metabolism in the prefrontal, pre-motor, and left superior parietal association regions. 4 key findings →
Participants: 46 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aducanumab (BIIB037) is a human monoclonal antibody selective for aggregated forms of beta-amyloid peptide being investigated as a disease-modifying treatment for AD. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Three deaths have been reported related to treatment with lecanemab.6 Patients receiving DMT require frequent monitoring with MRI brain scans (four or more per year), as there is a high rate of clinically significant amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), both brain oedema (ARIA-E) and macro- and microhaemorrhages (ARIA-H). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia, and epidemiological studies support that type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major contributor. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
However, the fibrils in primary amyloidosis (AL) consist of the variable portion of a monoclonal light chain (κ or λ); secondary amyloidosis (AA) fibrils consist of protein A, a non-immunoglobulin; familial amyloidosis fibrils are usually composed of mutated transthyretin (prealbumin); senile systemic amyloid fibrils consist of normal transthyretin; and amyloid associated with long-term dialysis consists of β2-microglobulin. 5 key findings →
Participants: 60 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Studies of the association of high blood pressure (BP) with dementia are not consistent. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this multicenter study, the clinical efficacy of citalopram was investigated in 98 patients with moderate AD/SDAT or VD using a combined double-blind and open technique with placebo and citalopram. 2 key findings →
Participants: 98 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Physostigmine (0.25 mg-1 mg), arecoline (2 and 4 mg) and saline were administered intravenously over 30 minutes in a randomized double blind design to 11 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer presenile dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Fifteen cases were identified (14 men). All had clear histories of dream enactment behavior, and 10 had RBD confirmed by polysomnography. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our earlier studies using the Consortium to Establish a Registry of Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological battery showed that delayed recall was a highly sensitive indicator of early Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Participants: 49 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A stress and coping model was used to study predictors of individual differences in caregiver adaptation. 2 key findings →
Participants: 54 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events