Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age-related multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder. 4 key findings →
Participants: 26 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an age-related multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder. 4 key findings →
Participants: 26 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) is a single-pass transmembrane receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is secreted in a soluble (sTREM2) form. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study aims to quantify microglial activation in individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) using the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) PET imaging in the hippocampus and precuneus, the 2 AD-vulnerable regions, and to evaluate the association of baseline neuroinflammation with amyloidosis, tau, and longitudinal cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Baseline tau-PET and a composite baseline cognitive score were the strongest independent predictors of cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease, a neurodegenerative disease with amyloid beta accumulation as a major hallmark, has become a dire global health concern as there is a lack of clear understanding of the causative agent. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) is a major heterogeneous brain disease caused by multiple factors, and it is the second most common type of dementia in the world. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder; it is the most common cause of dementia and has no treatment. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Eligibility to randomize into the A3 Trial or A45 Trial is based on the screening PET imaging results. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Both groups showed significant improvements in all cognitive function measurements (P<.001). 3 key findings →
Participants: 18 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Adherence to the MIND diet was associated with better cognitive function at baseline and over 8 years of follow-up; however, MIND diet was not associated with 8-year cognitive trajectory. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Most recommendations on standards and norms for palliative care in Europe remain unchanged since 2009. 1 key finding →
Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, the results suggest that ARC is reliable and valid and represents a feasible tool for assessing cognitive changes associated with the earliest stages of AD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 22 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found patient and care partner input to be critical throughout the development process for early identification of design and usability issues and for identifying solutions not previously considered by our research team. 2 key findings →
Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
BrainCheck was able to distinguish between diagnoses of dementia, MCI, and NC, providing a potentially reliable tool for early detection of cognitive impairment. 1 key finding →
Participants: 99 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results suggest that the ki:e SB-C is an objective, scalable, and reliable indicator of cognitive decline, fit for purpose as a remote assessment in clinical early dementia trials. 3 key findings →
Participants: 69 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Robust and accessible biomarkers that can capture the heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease and its diverse pathological processes are urgently needed. 2 key findings →
Participants: 18 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Recent Medicare claims perform reasonably well in identifying dementia; however, there are consistent differences in cases of dementia identified through claims than in rigorous cohort evaluations. 5 key findings →
Participants: 54 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this study, mental disorders were associated with the onset of dementia in the population. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Discrimination of disease-related interactions of the core subsystem and FPN was found in AD-spectrum patients, which was the neural circuit fundamental to plasma NFL disrupting cognitive integrity. 3 key findings →
Participants: 112 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL)'s link to dementia may be mediated through white matter integrity (WMI). 2 key findings →
Participants: 163 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Studying the correlation between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metabolites and the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) biomarkers may offer a window to the alterations of the brain metabolome and unveil potential biological mechanisms underlying AD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 338 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) was associated with brain Aβ deposition and Alzheimer's disease (AD) development. 4 key findings →
Participants: 449 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher CSF cortisol was associated with poorer global cognitive performance and higher disease severity at baseline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 145 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The brain-derived neurotropic growth factor (BDNF) gene has been linked to dementia, inflammation, and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ɛ4 status. 1 key finding →
Participants: 114 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
MDT-OS and ORR-LDR were weakly-to-moderately correlated with the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC5) (r = 0.3-0.44, p < .001) and with several other measures of episodic memory, processing speed, and executive function. 5 key findings →
Participants: 172 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →