A total of 172 participants were randomized. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 172 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
During the 4-year follow-up, 134 individuals were diagnosed with dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,220 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study cohort included 245 patients with FTD (121 female [49.4%], 124 male [50.6%]; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [8.7] years), 2416 matched HCs (1190 female [49.3%], 1226 male [50.7%]; mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.5] years), and 1326 patients with AD (777 female [58.6%], 549 male [41.4%]; mean [SD] age, 71.7 [9.8] years). 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 245 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
-fold changes of 1.21, 0.57, and 4.63, respectively, compared to A-. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 252 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over 7,430,253 person-years of follow-up, 11,345 dementia cases occurred (10,863 AD and 2,159 VaD). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 296,001 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In both the mortality and readmission cohorts we found significant associations with each pollutant. 5 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 118 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The discovery cohort contained 3,671 individuals with a mean age of 68 years and consisted of 49% reported female. 5 key findings →
Participants: 3,671 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Forty-nine outcomes were presented to survey respondents. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The interventions proved effective in improving executive functions. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 112 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 325 participants enrolled and received study drug. 5 key findings →
Participants: 320 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
58/100
Of the total of 1795 subjects randomized in Clarity AD, 294 subjects were in the Asian region (Japan:152; Korea:129; Singapore:13). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 294 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Late-life depression (LLD) has been linked to increased likelihood of dementia, although mechanisms responsible for this association remain largely unknown. 3 key findings →
Participants: 31 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.009). Other neuropathologies were similar across cognitive groups. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 40 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Thirty-nine articles were included, with 21 meta-analyses and 18 qualitative systematic reviews. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the UK Biobank cohort (N = 166,916), MIND diet demonstrated the broadest neuroprotective effects. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 166,916 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Outcomes of interest were duration of delirium, health-related quality of life, delirium severity, cognitive function, mortality in the ICU, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay and adverse events. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 491 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
PLWD also commonly experience social isolation (Shen et al., 2022), poorer physical function (Jehu et al., 2024a), worsened behavioral and psychological symptoms (Cerejeira et al., 2012), poorer quality of life (Cerejeira et al., 2012), and reduced access to healthcare (Mitchell et al., 2016) compared to older adults without dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Anemia among older adults aged ≥ 60 years is a well-described risk factor that increases the risk of falls, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 3,252 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Thirty-four reviews were included, published between 2009 and 2023. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is marked by progressive cognitive decline linked to oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 29 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The optimal cut-offs differed between CU and CI groups. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
With the moderate sample size of the current study, treatment using sodium benzoate, a DAO inhibitor, showed promise in improving cognition, especially short-term memory, in patients with aMCI. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
57/100
The beneficial effects of a ketogenic diet (KD) on neurodegenerative conditions such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) are increasingly acknowledged, with potential implications for the general population as well. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
AF is associated with significantly increased risk of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and mortality. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the context of global ageing, the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases and dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), is increasing. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →