These results indicate that declines in connected speech may be related to preclinical AD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
After the clinical implementation of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for people with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is an urgent need to efficiently identify this patient population in primary care. 4 key findings →
Participants: 223 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Using hippocampal atrophy as a quantitative phenotype in a genome-wide scan, we have identified candidate risk genes for sporadic Alzheimer's disease that merit further investigation. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Participants: 381 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
DNA methylation is a vital component of the epigenetic machinery that orchestrates changes in multiple genes and helps regulate gene expression in all known vertebrates. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Higher amyloid beta burden was associated with increasing anxious-depressive symptoms over time in cognitively normal older individuals. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 270 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients with AD have altered microvascular network in the retina (narrower retinal venules and a sparser and more tortuous retinal vessels) compared with matched nondemented controls. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 136 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The analysis of the comorbidities associated with an index disease (e.g., dementia) must not be exclusively based on prevalence rates, but rather on methodologies that allow the discovery of non-random associations between diseases. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 72,815 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Crenezumab doses of ≤120 mg/kg intravenously q4w were well tolerated. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Asymptomatic ARIA-E was detected in solanezumab-treated and placebo-treated AD patients. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 2,042 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Methylthioninium (MT) is a tau aggregation inhibitor with therapeutic potential in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the general population, the use of statins, but not of non-statin cholesterol-lowering drugs, was associated with a lower risk of AD compared with never use of cholesterol-lowering drugs. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,992 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this cohort study, statin therapy was not associated with a decreased risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,798 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
62/100
A lower incidence of dementia in bipolar patients treated with lithium has been described. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Prior qualitative literature reviews about the use of neuroleptics in dementia suggest that they are "modestly effective" in treating agitation and that no single neuroleptic is better than another. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this population-based longitudinal study, carotid IMT was associated with a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment during the 10-year follow-up, and was associated with poorer performance in a test of executive function 10 years later. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,651 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In cognitively unimpaired adults with increased risk for AD, increased exposure to air pollution was suggested to be associated with greater global atrophy and reduced volume and thickness in specific brain areas known to be affected in AD, thus suggesting a potential link between environmental exposures and cerebral vulnerability to AD. 4 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 958 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
62/100
Our results showed a positive association between exposure to NOx and O 3 and hospitalization for dementia and a negative association between NO 2 exposure and hospitalization for dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 350,844 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To review the evidence for risk factors of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), we pooled and reanalyzed the raw data of three case-control studies. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 178 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results support an association between anemia experienced early in life and the later development of Parkinson disease. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 196 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To explore the nature of the olfactory dysfunction associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), 81 PD patients who scored well on a cognitive screening test were administered the 40-odorant University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; 38 were additionally given a forced-choice phenylethyl alcohol odor detection threshold test. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 24 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Stress was more often reported by care providers who had been working for 1 to 2 years (compared with longer); in addition, those who had been working for 1 to 2 years were more likely to espouse hopeful or person-centered attitudes than those who had been working for a longer period of time. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The 2-year rate of infection was 1.20 episodes per 100 resident days, and the hospitalization rate for infection was 0.17 admissions per 100 resident days. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Even in persons who are currently nondisabled, a simple measure of lower extremity performance is predictive of subsequent hospitalization, especially for geriatric conditions. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,381 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study provides a comprehensive estimate of the excess costs that result from providing informal dementia care in the community. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,043 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A large number of non-pharmacological interventions for BPSD were identified. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →