You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 2,651–2,675 of 17,563 studies scoring 30–49 out of 100 (page 107 of 703)· 30,980 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)
From OpenAlex; 16,452 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing public health concern in Asia, with an increasing prevalence driven by demographic shifts and rising life expectancy. 5 key findings →
We identify a risk hierarchy for ARIA-H among anti-Aβ mAbs and link specific mAb biophysical properties-Aβ binding type, affinity for soluble oligomers, epitope specificity, Fc structure, and plaque clearance dynamics-directly to ARIA-H pathogenesis. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.·Emergency radiology·2024-09-27
Since the 2021 FDA approval of the first monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD), treatment has progressed from symptom management to targeting and reducing amyloid β plaque burden. 4 key findings →
Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are the first drugs approved as disease targeted therapies for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Recent advances in hereditary dementia research have clarified its molecular pathogenesis and clinical applications, with several advances already reaching implementation. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.·BMC medicine·2026-07-29
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disorder, the treatment of which remains a major clinical challenge. 1 key finding →
With the European authorisation of lecanemab and donanemab, Italy is entering the era of disease-modifying therapy for early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies provide disease-modifying treatment options for selected patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer disease, but introduce new challenges for acute stroke care. 5 key findings →
Passive immunotherapy targeting amyloid-β (Aβ) has emerged as a major therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet its clinical benefits remain modest and are frequently accompanied by vascular adverse events such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.·The neurologist·2026-07-01
Monoclonal antibodies that target Aβ monomers, soluble oligomers and protofibrils, and insoluble fibrils/plaques were developed, and not all have provided clinical benefit. 4 key findings →
BackgroundWhile large language models (LLMs) have a potential to simulate public-opinion, their reliability for sensitive medical topics like novel Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments remains unclear. 5 key findings →
Despite the risks of ARIA and other adverse events, Donanemab-azbt represents a promising addition to AD therapy, offering the potential for improved outcomes in patients with early symptomatic disease and expanding the therapeutic options beyond traditional symptomatic treatments. 4 key findings →
Multimodal neuroimaging plays an indispensable role in the diagnosis, monitoring, and therapeutic evaluation of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.·Cureus·2026-04-20
Alzheimer's dementia is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder in which cognitive decline, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and functional dependence emerge from a long preclinical and prodromal phase. 4 key findings →
We induced ARIA without significant cortical CAA pathology and identified regional differences with TNF inhibition including a potential benefit of treatment in the hippocampus and possible detriment to pathology in the cortex. 3 key findings →
7B8 effectively alleviates cognitive impairment and clears cerebral and perivascular amyloid deposits in young APP/PS1 mice with early-stage AD pathology and minimal CAA, with no increased risk of microhemorrhage in this experimental setting. 3 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.·Value in Health·2025-01-27
The Inflation Reduction Act Medicare Part D benefit redesign will reduce OOP drug spending for beneficiaries with dementia, resulting in potentially marked savings not only for low-income beneficiaries and beneficiaries with a high comorbidity burden but also for higher-income beneficiaries. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.·Neurobiology of aging·2004-05-01
Amyloid plaques appear early during Alzheimer's disease (AD), and their development is intimately linked to activated astrocytes and microglia. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.·Neurology and therapy·2019-12-12
The search for accessible and cost-effective biomarkers to complement current cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and imaging biomarkers in the accurate detection of Alzheimer disease (AD) and other common neurodegenerative disorders remains a challenging task. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100.·Neurology·2018-08-03
SIs on the LASSI-L related to PSI and frPSI uniquely differentiated Amy+ and Amy- participants with aMCI and likely reflect deficits with inhibition and source memory in preclinical AD not captured by traditional cognitive measures. 2 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.