16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-19
Blood-based neurofilament light (NfL) is associated with all-cause mortality, but whether this reflects neuroaxonal injury or overlaps with cognitive and functional decline remains unclear. 3 key findings →
Participants: 559
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-20
In Phase 1 (n =176), inpatients with delirium showed higher concentrations of both NfL and GFAP than patients with dementia (β = 0.78; 95% CI [0.37, 1.20] and β = 0.39 [0.07, 0.73] respectively) or PPD groups (β = 1.17; [0.69, 1.66] and β = 0.83 [0.51, 1.24] respectively). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 176
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-16
Higher pTau217 was associated with greater likelihood of developing dementia 11 years later. 5 key findings →
Participants: 3,935
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-15
Distinct biomarker associations with cognitive and emotional functioning support further longitudinal evaluation of BBMs for risk characterization in Latino older adults and potential disease monitoring applications. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 122
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-06
Interventions targeting lifestyle and health behaviors support cognition in older adults at risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,260
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-07
Current biobanking guidelines require in-person blood collection and immediate processing for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker assessment. 4 key findings →
Participants: 43
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-06
Educational attainment and physical activity PRSs were associated with AD in both sexes. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 27,751
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-09-29
In exploratory full-cohort models, the multivariate CNS signature achieved an area under the curve of 0.93, compared with 0.82 for the multivariate inflammation signature. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study
Participants: 177
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-09-28
Tau-PET subtype modified the p-tau217–memory association, suggesting that the cognitive implications of plasma p-tau217 may vary with tau topography. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Participants: 396
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-08-10
Social isolation was associated with elevated blood-based biomarkers of neuronal injury, with variation by patterns of exposure over time. 5 key findings →
Participants: 3,862
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-07-18
Middle-aged adults with faster 15-year epigenetic aging trajectories demonstrated worse cognitive performance, whereas those with slower biological aging trajectories exhibited cognitive resilience and more favorable AD biomarker profiles. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,833
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-08
Frailty index was associated with carboxylic acids and derivatives, fatty acyls and organooxygen compounds across multiple clusters, and a large number of lipids were linked to frailty score, potentially implicating dysregulation of energy metabolism in the pathophysiology of frailty and forming a panel of predictive biomarkers of at risk patients. 3 key findings →
Participants: 118
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-08-02
All three frameworks recognized biologically coherent AD-related signal despite differences in training cohort and assay methodology. 1 key finding →
Participants: 472
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-07-31
Bidirectional stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify plasma biomarkers associated with brain Aβ deposition. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 541
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2025-12-18
The observed phenotypic and genetic associations highlight shared underlying mechanisms among plasma biomarkers. 2 key findings →
Participants: 696
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-01-15
In this cross-sectional study (n=272), plasma pTau217/Aβ42 ratio test accuracy was 90% in Veterans without TBI history, but was significantly lower (63-78% accuracy) in Veterans with TBI history, with lowest accuracy in those with greater TBI severity. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 93
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-01-23
An age-related decline in vasodilation mediated by neurovascular nitric oxide (NO) and vasoconstriction driven by the Piezo1 receptor precede the aggregation of soluble brain proteins such as amyloid-β (Aβ), which then causes further disruption of brain solute homeostasis, ultimately leading to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. 1 key finding →
Participants: 29
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-01-29
Untargeted mass spectrometry remains underutilised for blood-based biomarker discovery in dementia research from large cohorts, where affinity-based approaches dominate. 3 key findings →
Participants: 14,258
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-01-06
The analytic sample included 4,465 individuals (mean age 69.7±10.4 years; 58.7% female; 75.8% non-Hispanic White). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 51
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-02-17
a Structured abstract BACKGROUND Over the past couple of decades, the role of infections, as well as the involvement of the immune system, have been highlighted in the development of dementia. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-02-23
Compared to the CN group, both MCI (β=−1.25, SE=0.19, p <.001) and AD dementia (β=−1.52, SE=0.16, p <.001) participants had lower Brain & Vascular Health composite scores. 3 key findings →
Participants: 197
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-04-01
The clock claims are unsupported. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 83
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-28
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease primarily affecting motor neurons but also frequently involving cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-24
Alzheimer’s disease is diagnosed after a decade-long phase in which pathology accumulates; current markers show that pathology is present, but not how far it has advanced. 5 key findings →
Participants: 609
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
16/100
⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100.
·
medRxiv
·
2026-10-14
CSF DDC reflects nigrostriatal dopaminergic dysfunction, representing a potential quantitative biochemical alternative to DaT-SPECT that might be readily implemented via automated immunoassays. 2 key findings →
Participants: 891
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.