28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Among cognitively unimpaired participants with a family history of dementia, changes in cognition and brain MRI outcomes from baseline to year 3 did not differ significantly between those who followed the MIND diet and those who followed the control diet with mild caloric restriction. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 604 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Further studies are warranted to develop and refine the specific MIND diet for different populations. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 224,049 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During the CEE plus MPA intervention phase, the numbers of CHD cases were 196 for CEE plus MPA vs 159 for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.95-1.45) and 206 vs 155, respectively, for invasive breast cancer (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53). 3 key findings →
Participants: 8,506 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among older adults at risk of cognitive decline and dementia, a structured, higher-intensity intervention had a statistically significant greater benefit on global cognition compared with an unstructured, self-guided intervention. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,056 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Greater consumption of caffeinated coffee and tea was associated with lower risk of dementia and modestly better cognitive function, with the most pronounced association at moderate intake levels. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 131,821 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A higher percentage of daily energy consumption of ultraprocessed foods was associated with cognitive decline among adults from an ethnically diverse sample. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 10,775 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 92 383 participants, 60 582 (65.6%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 56.4 (8.0) years. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 92,383 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Tai Chi shows potential to enhance cognitive function in older adults, particularly in the realm of executive functioning and in individuals without significant impairment. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 2,553 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
PM 2.5 might be a risk factor for dementia, as well as nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen oxide, although with more limited data. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean (SD) age was 73.7 (6.0) years, and the mean (SD) follow-up time was 3.7 (1.2) years. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 223 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings provide evidence for a relationship between all types of alcohol use and increased dementia risk. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 559,559 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In older women, habitual sleep duration predicts the future risk for cognitive impairments including dementia, independent of vascular risk factors. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 5 071 935 participants were included from 27 studies; approximately 49.2% of participants were female, and 14 studies were conducted in Asia, 7 in North America, 3 in Europe, and 3 in Oceania, represented by Australia. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 935 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
From the 868 Framingham Heart Study participants who returned for a second PSG, this cohort included 346 participants with a mean age of 69 years (range, 60-87 years); 179 (52%) were female. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 346 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
LATE-NC is a common TDP-43 proteinopathy, associated with an amnestic dementia syndrome that mimicked Alzheimer's-type dementia in retrospective autopsy studies. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our results suggest that higher glucose levels may be a risk factor for dementia, even among persons without diabetes. 4 key findings →
Participants: 839 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 172 patients were included (86 each in the sotatercept and placebo groups). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 172 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A substantial proportion of the relationship between education and dementia was mediated through mid-life vascular risk factors. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 13,368 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the cohort analyses, 891 incident dementia cases were identified over 166,762 person-years. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 207,981 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.04). Replacing 1 serving per day of nuts and legumes for processed red meat was associated with a 19% lower risk of dementia (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.86), 1.37 fewer years of cognitive aging (95% CI -2.49 to -0.25), and a 21% lower risk of SCD (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Smoking cessation was associated with a sustained lower dementia risk and slower cognitive decline, comparable to never smokers and those without short-term risk increase. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 32,802 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Sample 1 included 1656 participants (mean [range] age, 58.1 [29.7-85.6] years; 903 female [54.5%]), and sample 2 included 935 participants (mean [range] age, 67.6 [60.0-85.6] years; 518 female [55.4%]). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,656 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 450 111 participants were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [9.8] years; 70.8% women) and followed up during a median (IQR) time of 14.9 (4.1) years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 111 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
44 participants were included: 20 PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers and 24 non-carriers. 2 key findings →
Participants: 44 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The exact etiology of dementia is still unclear, but both genetic and lifestyle factors are thought to be key drivers of this complex disease. 1 key finding →
Participants: 6,352 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →