27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Alzheimer disease (AD) and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) involve the abnormal accumulation in the brain of filaments composed of both three-repeat (3R) and four-repeat (4R) (3R/4R) tau isoforms. 1 key finding →
Participants: 16 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) is a form of Alzheimer-type neurofibrillary degeneration occurring in the absence of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. 3 key findings →
Participants: 174 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) is a frequent late-onset, 4-repeat tauopathy reported in Caucasians with high educational attainment. 2 key findings →
Participants: 983 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) is a neurodegenerative entity defined as Alzheimer-type neurofibrillary degeneration primarily affecting the medial temporal lobe with minimal to absent amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition. 3 key findings →
Participants: 914 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study provides health economists, researchers and policy-makers with a reference for health utilities of various chronic conditions, different age groups, gender and comorbidities. 2 key findings →
Participants: 17,626 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Multivariate analyses assessed the strength of association of comorbid conditions with epilepsy as compared with the general population. 3 key findings →
Participants: 49,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Dementia was associated with dysbiosis characterized by differences in beta diversity and changes in taxonomic composition. 5 key findings →
Participants: 23 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Clinical Dementia Rating-Global scores (1.44 ± 0.65 versus 0.24 ± 0.25; P < 0.0001) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores (4.88 ± 4.21 versus 0.20 ± 0.50; P < 0.0001) were higher than controls. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 25 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Since the world population is ageing, dementia is going to be a growing concern. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cognitive decline in preclinical AD finds tauopathy has a more impact than Aβ-42. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The new diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) acknowledges the interest given to biomarkers to improve the specificity in subjects with dementia and to facilitate an early diagnosis of the pathophysiological process of AD in the prodromal or pre-dementia stage. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Dominance of 4R over three-repeat (exon 10-) tau isoforms contrasts with earlier reports of R406W patients and was not sufficiently explained by the presence of H1/H2 haplotypes in two of the autopsied patients. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Microtubule-associated protein tau was purified from bovine brain microtubules by either (1) phosphocellulose chromatography, (2) heat treatment at pH 6.4, (3) heat treatment at pH 2.7, (4) heat treatment at pH 2.7 followed by extraction with perchloric acid and precipitation with glycerol, or (5) by precipitation with ammonium sulfate followed by extraction with perchloric acid.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) was proposed in 2014 as a neuropathological term to describe patients with Alzheimer's-type medial temporal lobe neurofibrillary degeneration in the absence of significant β-amyloid pathology. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.038) over time. Physical activity was associated with less synaptic dysfunction and cognitive activity with less synaptic dysfunction and lower amyloid burden over time, albeit effect sizes were small. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) is a β-amyloid-independent tauopathy, thought by some to be a distinct process from Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 174 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene is the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with synaptic dysfunction identified as an early pathological hallmark. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study indicates that high AGE levels could be a contributing factor to impaired mobility but lacks evidence for an association with ADL decline in people with early stage AD or mixed dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 144 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We have reported that the ambient gyrus is the site with the greatest accumulation of argyrophilic grains (AGs) and that the degeneration of the ambient gyrus is responsible for dementia with grains. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,405 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Eligibility to randomize into the A3 Trial or A45 Trial is based on the screening PET imaging results. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Axonal degeneration, synaptic dysfunction, astroglial activation, and altered tau metabolism are involved already in preclinical AD. 1 key finding →
Participants: 770 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cardiac 123I-MIBG findings are similar among idiopathic RBD and the syndromes of PD and DLB, but differ from those of PSP and MSA. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 95 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our findings lend support to a model in which fibrillar Aβ is still accumulating in the early stages of clinical disease but approaching a relative plateau, a point at which Aβ may uncouple from neurodegenerative processes including synaptic loss. 5 key findings →
Participants: 14 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The progressive development of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related lesions such as neurofibrillary tangles,amyloid deposits and synaptic loss within the cerebral cortex is a main event of brain aging. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →