Indeed, in our review, we observed a stage-dependent neuroinflammatory process in the AD brain. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Among 809 participants (mean [SD] age at death, 91.3 [6.1] years; 538 [72%] female; mean [SD] follow-up, 7.2 [4.4] years), HS was present in 82 (10.1%) participants; 71 participants (9%) had both HS and LATE-NC, and in the scored subset, 43 participants (14%) had moderate and 35 participants (12%) had severe hippocampal neuronal loss. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 300 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We characterized the world's second case with ascertained extreme resilience to autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our ancestry-aware regression approach showed that AA individuals have a lower risk of AD if they inherited African ancestry admixture block at the 17p13.2 locus. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 10,271 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of this study indicate that the DMN abnormalities observed in patients with AD represent an accelerated aging pattern of connectivity compared with matched controls. 3 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These initial data suggest that serum protein-based biomarkers can be combined with clinical information to accurately classify AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 197 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
59/100
In addition to known candidate genes, APOE, TOMM40, and one hypothetical gene LOC100129500 partially overlapping APOE; one novel gene, EPC2, and several other interesting genes were associated with CSF biomarkers that are related to AD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 374 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previous estimates of the utility of polygenic risk score analysis for the prediction of Alzheimer disease have given area under the curve (AUC) estimates of <80%. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
59/100
Arterial stiffness, measured by PWV, is an emerging risk factor for dementia through its repeated relationships with cognition, cSVD, and Aβ deposition. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low plasma levels of apoE are associated with increased risk of future Alzheimer disease and all dementia in the general population, independent of ε2/ε3/ε4 APOE genotype. 3 key findings →
Participants: 75,708 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The APOE epsilon4 allele acts as a potent risk factor for AD by accelerating onset. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 3,308 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The mean (SD) age at death was statistically significantly younger for participants who had AD with Lewy bodies (77.9 [9.5] years) than for participants who had AD without Lewy bodies (80.2 [11.1] years) (P = .01). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Psychotic symptoms occur in ~40% of subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are associated with more rapid cognitive decline and increased functional deficits. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The 751 study participants were older (median age [interquartile range], 87 years [51-105 years]), 395 (54%) were women, and 324 (44%) were APOE ε4 carriers. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 604 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium following surgery is common and associated with adverse outcomes. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 282 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2157 older adults without dementia (mean [SD] age 71.2 [9.2] years; 1337 female [62.0%]), 1680 participants had longitudinal cognition data and 569 participants (26.4%) had APOE34/44 genotypes. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,680 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
59/100
The study constructed gene-regulatory networks in postmortem brain tissues from late-onset Alzheimer's disease patients and nondemented subjects to characterize associated molecular systems. 3 key findings →
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To address computational and analytic challenges in whole-genome association studies (WGAS), researchers developed PLINK, an open-source C/C++ tool set. 5 key findings →
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although genomewide RNA expression analysis has become a routine tool in biomedical research, extracting biological insight from such information remains a major challenge.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Neuropathology studies show that patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease typically have lesions of the entorhinal cortex (EC), hippocampus (Hip), and temporal neocortex. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 12 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Sleep duration, psychiatric disorders and dementias are closely interconnected in older adults. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
59/100
Sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) exclusively affects elderly people. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Diabetes was associated with shorter lifespan in APOE3 carriers (n = 12,415, HR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.17-1.42, p < 0.001) and APOE2 carriers (n = 2,390, HR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.10-1.69, p = 0.016), while such associations were weaker and not significant in APOE4 carriers (n = 9,490, HR = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.99-1.24, p = 0.162). 5 key findings →
Participants: 12,415 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
59/100
The PRS for AD was significantly higher in APOE ε4 homozygote AD cases compared to older cognitively healthy APOE ε4/ε4 controls (odds ratio [OR] 8.39; confidence interval [CI] 2.0-35.2; P = .003). 4 key findings →
Participants: 213 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Brain arteriolosclerosis (B-ASC) is characterized by pathologically altered brain parenchymal arterioles. 3 key findings →
Participants: 3,382 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →