These results provide new insight into the genetic basis of habitual PA, and the genetic links connecting PA with other traits and diseases. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 8,556
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In the replication stage, we performed genotyping of significant and suggestive results from the discovery stage. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 1,743
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Narcolepsy type 1 is strongly associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQB1*06:02; however, no significant associations between IH and HLA alleles have been reported. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 414
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The aims of this study were to identify candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to generate SNP to gene to pathway hypotheses. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 370,542
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
GWAS of Alzheimer's disease have been predominantly based on European ancestry cohorts with clinically diagnosed patients. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Identifying ancestry-specific molecular profiles of late-onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD) in brain tissue is crucial to understand novel mechanisms and develop effective interventions in non-European, high-risk populations. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 731
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The need for large sample sizes has led to collaborative efforts, such as the Prospective Studies Collaboration (an individual participant meta-analysis of data from 61 studies and more than a million participants11) that has demonstrated conclusively that a continuous increase in blood pressure corresponds with an increased risk of vascular death across all age groups (see Figure 1 that illustrates the importance of a large sample size (about 500 000 participants) for detecting this association).12 Sample size is also of particular importance in the current era of genome-wide association studies, where many investigations are aiming to detect either small effects from common variants or large effects from rare variants.13 Absolute risk of ischaemic heart disease mortality by usual systolic blood pressure and age at risk in 5000, 50 000, and 500 000 participants. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 5,200
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
To identify common variants contributing to normal variation in two specific domains of cognitive functioning, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of executive functioning and information processing speed in non-demented older adults from the CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) consortium. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 32,070
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Recent genome-wide association studies have identified 5 loci (BIN1, CLU, CR1, EXOC3L2, and PICALM) as genetic determinants of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 2,816
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Mutations in the gene encoding profilin 1 (PFN1) have recently been shown to cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a fatal neurodegenerative disorder. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 485
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
79/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 79 out of 100.
·
Genome medicine
·
2011-05-31
Our results underscore the importance of international efforts combining GWAS datasets to isolate genetic loci for complex diseases. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 10,181
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
JAMA
·
2013-04-01
Genome-wide significance in fully adjusted models (sex, age, APOE genotype, population stratification) was observed for a SNP in ABCA7 (rs115550680, allele = G; frequency, 0.09 cases and 0.06 controls; odds ratio [OR], 1.79 [95% CI, 1.47-2.12]; P = 2.2 × 10(-9)), which is in linkage disequilibrium with SNPs previously associated with Alzheimer disease in Europeans (0.8 Conclusions and relevance In this meta-analysis of data from African American participants, Alzheimer disease was significantly associated with variants in ABCA7 and with other genes that have been associated with Alzheimer disease in individuals of European ancestry. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 5,896
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
JAMA neurology
·
2021-01-01
In addition, several loci associated with rare variants, including a genome-wide significant intergenic locus near IGF1R at 15q26 (P = 1.7 × 10-9) and 6 additional loci with suggestive significance (P ≤ 5 × 10-7) such as API5 at 11p12 (P = 8.8 × 10-8) and RBFOX1 at 16p13 (P = 5.4 × 10-7) were identified. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 2,784
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The effect of genome-wide significant variants at the GFRA2 locus on expression of GFRA2 was assessed using mRNA expression studies in cerebellar tissue samples from the Mayo Clinic brain bank. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 382
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
78/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 78 out of 100.
·
Nature
·
2025-04-09
Osteoarthritis is the third most rapidly growing health condition associated with disability, after dementia and diabetes 1 . 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
77/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 77 out of 100.
·
Nature Genetics
·
2022-04
This was, at the time, the largest genetic study of Alzheimer's disease ever done, comparing DNA from over 111,000 people with the disease (or a strong family history) to nearly 680,000 people without it. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 788,989
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is strongly determined by genetic factors and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genes for the disease risk. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 2,222
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
76/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100.
·
Nature genetics
·
2007-01-01
The past decade has witnessed hundreds of reports declaring or refuting genetic association with putative Alzheimer disease susceptibility genes. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Ann Neurol 2018;84:737-748. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 443
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
This situation presents difficulties for experimental studies, drug development, and other future research. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 94
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been used to combine the effects of variants with small effects identified by genome-wide association studies. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 1,200
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common and complex neurodegenerative disease in the elderly individuals. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 14,138
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Whole-exome sequencing of individuals with mild cognitive impairment, combined with genotype imputation, was used to identify coding variants other than the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele associated with rate of hippocampal volume loss using an extreme trait design. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Participants: 315
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
76/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100.
·
EBioMedicine
·
2017-04-04
HPA axis genes implicated in glucocorticoid regulation play an important role in regulating the physiological impact of social and environmental stress, and have become a focal point for investigating the role of glucocorticoid regulation in the etiology of disease. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 32
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Lewy body dementia (LBD) is the second most prevalent dementia, however most genetic risk remains uncharacterized. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 29,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.