27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Educational support for general practitioners should concentrate on epidemiological knowledge, disclosure of the diagnosis and management of behaviour problems in dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The findings highlight the regional specificity of the association of WMHs with AD. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 717 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results suggest that the contribution of education to cognitive reserve is limited to its association with level of cognitive function before old age. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,899 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In elderly persons, antipsychotic drugs are clinically prescribed off-label for a number of disorders outside of their Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Black decedents with AD dementia are more likely to have mixed brain pathologies compared with age-, sex-, education-, and cognition-matched white decedents with AD dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 122 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In response to KKM treatment, 68 genes were found to be differentially expressed (19 up-regulated, 49 down-regulated) after adjusting for potentially confounded differences in sex, illness burden, and BMI. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At 16 weeks, 67.5% of intervention caregivers reported improvement in targeted problem behavior, compared with 45.8% of caregivers in a no-treatment control group (P=.002), and reduced upset with (P=.03) and enhanced confidence managing (P=.01) the behavior. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebrovascular disease is a significant and potentially preventable cause of dementia in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 179 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The primary outcome of this trial was negative. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Population-based estimates for the epidemiology of FTD varied widely in the included studies. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A structured, multicomponent skills training intervention that targeted CG self-care behaviors as one of five target areas, improved self-reported health status, and decreased burden and bother in racially and ethnically diverse CGs of people with dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
DLB becomes more common with increasing age and accounts for about 5% of all dementia cases in older populations. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Significant main effects in the expected direction were found for changes in most of these measures. 3 key findings →
Participants: 169 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Global assessments are Food and Drug Administration-required primary outcome measures in trials of putative antidementia drugs. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The online SiD decision aid increased preparation for decision making about firearm access in this sample of ADRD caregivers in the United States. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 500 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Music Interventions for Dementia and Depression in Elderly care was a large, multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the effects of group music therapy, recreational choir singing, or both compared with standard care. 2 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 1,021 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Caring for a family member with dementia is generally regarded as a chronically stressful process, with potentially negative physical health consequences. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Effects of caregiving on physical health have received less theoretical and empirical attention than effects on psychological health. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Patients were divided into a development (n = 3859) and validation (n = 1929) cohort. 2 key findings →
Participants: 3,859 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Because most interventions have domain-specific outcomes, clinicians must tailor interventions according to the specific needs of the individual caregivers. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
White matter hyperintensities are associated with increased risk of dementia and cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,367 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Decreases in depression scores at 13 weeks did not differ between 111 controls and 107 participants allocated to receive sertraline (mean difference 1·17, 95% CI -0·23 to 2·58; p=0·10) or mirtazapine (0·01, -1·37 to 1·38; p=0·99), or between participants in the mirtazapine and sertraline groups (1·16, -0·25 to 2·57; p=0·11); these findings persisted to 39 weeks. 3 key findings →
Participants: 107 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The comparative analysis provided a systematic review of cancer caregiving in the context of three other types of caregiving. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Classification resulted in 227 persons with prevalent dementia at entry into the study and 480 incident cases during follow-up. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 227 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
All six short-form ZBI have very good validity, internal consistency, and discriminative ability. 2 key findings →
Participants: 105 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →