27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This paper will describe initiatives within the RHS frameworks of the National Health Group (NHG) and the Alexandra Health System (AHS) to forge a frailty-ready healthcare system across the spectrum, which includes the well healthy ("living well"), the well unhealthy ("living with illness"), the unwell unhealthy ("living with frailty"), and the end-of-life (EoL) ("dying well"). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The most common underlying causes of death among the 49,172 deceased nursing home residents were circulatory diseases (42.2%) and dementia (22.7%). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
GPs are identifying patients for anticipatory and palliative care more equitably across the different disease trajectories and earlier in the disease process than they were previously identifying patients specifically for palliative care. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Integrated Memory Care Clinic (IMCC) is a patient-centered medical home as defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance directed by advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) caring for persons living with dementia (PLWD); physicians provide specialty consultation but do not direct care or care planning. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although a high proportion of patients received elements of palliative care, transitions to a goal of comfort or hospice happened very near death. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A nationwide ACP program in the primary care setting is a cost-effective or cost-saving intervention compared to usual care in a population at-risk of developing dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The geriatrician can have an important role in decisions for non-surgical management by shared decision making in the pre-operative period in patients ≥ 70 years with a hip fracture in the emergency room. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this study, we found an early warning score algorithm focused on deterioration prevention did not account for long-term management or palliative care trajectories. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Anticholinergic toxicity is a common problem in the elderly. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These findings may facilitate the timely and efficient management of CDAD in nursing home patients. 2 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Stroke is highly prevalent in long-term care. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over half of participants (54%) received SFU as initial second-line ADM, 14% received BI, and 32% received another ADM. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After accounting for individual and county level covariates, we found that a 10 percentage‐point increase in HCBS breadth among individuals with ADRD was associated with 1.1 percentage point reduction (P < 0.01) in the likelihood of NH placement. 3 key findings →
Participants: 365 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Several interconnected themes were identified as potential resources that enable recovery from delirium: (a) social contact and recovery of social lives; (b) the need for information, support, and education; (c) personalisation and personhood; (d) relationship continuity with professional carers; (e) the experience and involvement of carers; and (f) treating the cause and healthy lifestyle. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study cohort included 7167 delirium cases and 7167 matched controls. 5 key findings →
Participants: 7,167 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is a common health problem with serious and long-lasting health consequences that disproportionately affects vulnerable population groups (especially older people with dementia or frailty). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 4288 consultations with patients ≥65 years in the study periods, 402 (9.4%) involved possible or probable delirium. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
AI/AN patients at the end-of-life were more likely to be hospitalized and less likely to use hospice compared with their NHW counterparts. 4 key findings →
Participants: 6,975 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 177 403 decedents, 82.41% had cancer and 17.59% non-cancer diagnoses. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
There are well-documented racial disparities in the provision of end-of-life care and advance care planning (ACP). 5 key findings →
Participants: 580 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A standardized, semi-structured interview for examining and recording the mental state in elderly subjects is described.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Dysphagia is a prevalent difficulty among aging adults. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Delirium in nondemented femoral neck fracture patients is associated with the development of dementia and a higher mortality rate. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Compared with France, where the percentage of the elderly population has increased just twofold in the past 100 years, Japanese society is aging at an unprecedented rate. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 862 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →