27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Donepezil and memantine have similar modest clinical and spectroscopic effect on mild to moderate AD. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 32 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
No registered drug affects the deposition of Aβ in the brain of AD patients. 5 key findings →
Participants: 20 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These responder analyses may assist clinicians in evaluating the impact of memantine in a relevant clinical scenario, i.e., in patients with AD previously stabilized on a cholinesterase inhibitor. 3 key findings →
Participants: 404 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease (AD) and has also been investigated in patients with mild to moderate AD. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
ABT-089, an α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist, was evaluated for efficacy and safety in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease patients receiving stable doses of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 337 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The design decisions made for ADMET are important elements to be considered in trials assessing the safety and efficacy of medications for clinically significant apathy in Alzheimer disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In AD patients with symptoms of psychosis, agitation, or aggressive behavior, medications can have a small but significant impact on caregiver burden. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 361 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Because of the exploratory nature of the analyses and the small sample sizes for subgroup analysis there is the need for caution in interpreting these data. 2 key findings →
Participants: 111 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Reliability of the ACE-R was very good (alpha coefficient=0.8). 2 key findings →
Participants: 241 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Recently, increasing evidence has suggested the association between gut dysbiosis and Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression, yet the role of gut microbiota in AD pathogenesis remains obscure. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We describe the first large-scale, potentially label-enabling clinical trial of a preclinical treatment for ADAD. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 300 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were the most common adverse events reported in the phase 3 ENGAGE and EMERGE trials of aducanumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 1,691 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The effectiveness and safety of yokukansan (TJ-54), a traditional Japanese medicine (kampo) for the treatment of the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), were evaluated in 106 patients diagnosed as having Alzheimer's disease (AD) (including mixed-type dementia) or dementia with Lewy bodies. 4 key findings →
Participants: 106 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and memantine are commonly used in the management of dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Ginseng is one of the most popular herbs worldwide. 4 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed to provide a realistic image of the efficacy that could be expected after 26 weeks treatment with a 120-mg dose (40 mg t.i.d.) of EGb 761 (EGb). 4 key findings →
Participants: 309 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our results provide evidence of the potential of Souvenaid™ therapy for the treatment of behavioral disturbances and social cognition skills in FTD. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Nilotinib is safe and achieves pharmacologically relevant cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 37 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the intention-to-treat analysis, dementia risk was not different between GLP1-RA and DPP4i initiators (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.04; rates: 6.29 versus 6.64 per 1000 person-years; mean follow-up: 6.54 years); however, continuous GLP1-RA versus DPP4i use was associated with a 21% lower risk (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97; rates: 3.64 versus 4.82; mean follow-up: 2.71 years). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 107,424 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Donepezil treatment slows the progression of hippocampal atrophy, suggesting a neuroprotective effect of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 54 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The MIND and Mediterranean diets are associated with less postmortem AD pathology, primarily β-amyloid load. 5 key findings →
Participants: 581 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of bapineuzumab (AAB-001), a humanized monoclonal antibody to amyloid beta, were evaluated in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease in a phase 1, randomized, third-party unblinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose trial. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this exploratory study, SB-742457 and donepezil were associated with improvements in global function. 2 key findings →
Participants: 61 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These results indicate that trans-resveratrol has potential neuroprotective roles in the treatment of moderate to mild AD and that its mechanism may involve a reduction in the accumulation and toxicity of Aβ in the brain of patients, thereby reducing neuroinflammation. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 15 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 796 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →