27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Among cognitively unimpaired participants with a family history of dementia, changes in cognition and brain MRI outcomes from baseline to year 3 did not differ significantly between those who followed the MIND diet and those who followed the control diet with mild caloric restriction. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 604 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Further studies are warranted to develop and refine the specific MIND diet for different populations. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 224,049 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among older adults at risk of cognitive decline and dementia, a structured, higher-intensity intervention had a statistically significant greater benefit on global cognition compared with an unstructured, self-guided intervention. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,056 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Neuropathology was ubiquitous, with 94% of participants having 1+, 78% having 2+, 58% having 3+, and 35% having 4+. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,079 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A higher level of total daily physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 71 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The pathologic indices of Alzheimer disease, cerebrovascular disease, and Lewy body disease accumulate in the brains of older persons with and without dementia, but the extent to which they account for late life cognitive decline remains unknown. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 856 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results suggest that the contribution of education to cognitive reserve is limited to its association with level of cognitive function before old age. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,899 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The higher risk of AD among blacks may stem from lower level of cognitive test performance persisting throughout the observation period rather than faster rate of late-life cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 7,735 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Replication of these findings in a dietary intervention trial would be required to verify its relevance to brain health. 2 key findings →
Participants: 960 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 809 participants (mean [SD] age at death, 91.3 [6.1] years; 538 [72%] female; mean [SD] follow-up, 7.2 [4.4] years), HS was present in 82 (10.1%) participants; 71 participants (9%) had both HS and LATE-NC, and in the scored subset, 43 participants (14%) had moderate and 35 participants (12%) had severe hippocampal neuronal loss. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 300 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Loss of motor function is a common consequence of aging, but little is known about the factors that predict idiopathic motor decline. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 906 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher cardiovascular risk burden may predict decline in episodic memory, working memory, and perceptual speed and is associated with neurodegeneration and vascular lesions in the brain. 4 key findings →
Participants: 378 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Late-life lower BMI relates to faster rates of decline in cognition, specifically semantic memory and episodic memory, in both blacks and whites. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,134 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Latent neuropathologic profiles were identified using hierarchical clustering, and longitudinal cognitive trajectories associated with each profile were estimated using functional mixed-effects models. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 1,633 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We examined the association of social activity with cognitive decline in 1138 persons without dementia at baseline with a mean age of 79.6 (SD = 7.5) who were followed for up to 12 years (mean = 5.2; SD = 2.8). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,138 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Both groups exhibited significant, transient microbiome remodeling at Year 1 (the period of most active weight loss). 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We tested whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene expression levels are associated with cognitive decline in older adults. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Across imputed data sets, a median of 2,777 eligible individuals were included, with a median of 664 receiving a new HA prescription. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Baseline cognition was poorer in individuals born and residing in the South, particularly those attending desegregated schools at age 12. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 5,145 participants included in the analyses, 747 (14.5 %) reported hearing loss, including 207 Black adults and 199 White adults. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,145 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
All Hispanic/Latino immigrant adults, regardless of age at migration, have a cognitive health disadvantage (at each visit and over time) relative to U.S./mainland-born Hispanic/Latino individuals. 5 key findings →
Participants: 16,415 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Greater lifetime stress predicted poorer later-life cognition, and, in a small sample of African Americans, faster declines in a key domain of episodic memory. 4 key findings →
Participants: 50 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results suggest that education is robustly associated with level of cognitive function but not with rate of cognitive decline and that the former association primarily accounts for education's correlation with risk of dementia in old age. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research indicates that stress is linked to cognitive dysfunction. 2 key findings →
Participants: 467 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study has enrolled over 1,600 normal control participants since study inception. 150 original participants continue their participation. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 103 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →