Type 2 diabetes is associated with cognitive dysfunction and structural brain changes. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Of 3037 participants, a weighted 57.8% (raw count, 1345) were younger than 75 years, 56.2% (raw count, 1777) were women, and most (84.9% [raw count, 2268]) were White. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,037 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study included 722 911 hospitalization episodes, of which 66 676 were related to patients with ADRD (mean [SD] age, 83.4 [8.6] years; 42 439 [63.6%] female) and 656 235 were related to patients without ADRD (mean [SD] age, 66.0 [15.4] years; 351 246 [53.5%] female). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 722 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The weighted prevalence of dementia at provincial level in China in 2018 ranged from 2.62% (95%BCI: 1.70%, 3.91%) to 13.53% (95%BCI: 8.82%, 20.93%). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 17,176 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
59/100
Non-specific codes were most common. Alzheimer's and vascular dementia codes showed high regional variability. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,016 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We believe this information important when counseling elderly patients regarding the risks of mortality and PJI after TKA and risk-adjusting publicly reported TKA patient outcomes. 2 key findings →
Participants: 83,011 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Diagnosis frequency ranged across HRRs from 0.58 chronic conditions in Grand Junction, Colorado, to 1.23 in Miami, Florida (mean, 0.90 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.89-0.91]; median, 0.87 [interquartile range, 0.80-0.96]). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A positive 4AT (≥1) on admission demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.71 when compared to a clinical diagnosis of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 221 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.041). Socioeconomic status and residential area are associated with long-term survival in patients with EOD. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,825 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Frailty and dementia are associated with poor health outcomes and increased health care utilization. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,132,367 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that non-economic social deprivation, especially in terms of access to a grocery store, pharmacy, postal office, and bus stop, might be relevant for maintaining cognitive functioning in old age. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 91 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. 2 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The cross-disciplinary expertise, required for GA, common in the days before medical specialization and enabled by the relative paucity of development in various fields compared with today, can be reborn with the advent of Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems that make the tools of medical geography accessible to a wide variety of health care researchers and clinical subspecialties. 4 key findings →
Participants: 127 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Previous studies indicate that increased healthcare access through Medicaid expansion and alleviation of socioeconomic stressors via higher minimum wages improved health outcomes. 5 key findings →
Participants: 311 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We combine the MAX data with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable, and with state and county data on the percent of individuals receiving HCBS versus nursing home care. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with dementia, Parkinson's disease, atherosclerosis, diabetes type 2, sarcopenia and a high risk of morbidity and mortality. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) account for the largest burden of early mortality and are predicted to cost the global community more than US $30 trillion over the next 20 years. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Key independent variables included the interaction of NH quality (measured by 5‐star rating) and race (i.e. black versus white), and interaction of NH quality, race, and state Medicaid dementia‐related add‐on policies. 4 key findings →
Participants: 874,526 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The sense of food insecurity in a group of elderly people may be determined by the perception of distance to food outlets. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dual-related differences were significantly larger than race/ethnicity differences in PAC transitions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 2 197 732 beneficiaries enrolled in D-SNPs in 2021, 881 736 (40.1%) were living in counties with aligned enrollment available and 251 305 (11.4%) enrolled. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Medicare-funded home health care (HH) is a crucial resource helping Persons with Dementia (PwD) meet their care needs while aging in place. 1 key finding →
Participants: 907,553 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
40/100
After accounting for individual and county level covariates, we found that a 10 percentage‐point increase in HCBS breadth among individuals with ADRD was associated with 1.1 percentage point reduction (P < 0.01) in the likelihood of NH placement. 3 key findings →
Participants: 365 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older adults living in rural areas may face barriers to obtaining a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Mississippi Healthy Aging Data Report (see healthyagingdatareports.org) has helped policymakers, service providers, and advocates better understand the status of healthy aging in Mississippi. 5 key findings →
Participants: 663,581 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events