31,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Low SES substantially increased the risk of dementia and cognitive dysfunction, suggesting that public health strategies could reduce the dementia burden by reducing social inequalities. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,485,702 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This landmark NIH-funded trial (REACH II) tested a structured, multi-part support program for 642 Hispanic, White, and Black family caregivers of people with Alzheimer's or related dementias across 5 U.S. cities. 4 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 642 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Eighty-one percent of eligible participants were not aware of a dementia diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where feasible, we combined data to obtain an overall estimate of effect. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A structured, multicomponent skills training intervention that targeted CG self-care behaviors as one of five target areas, improved self-reported health status, and decreased burden and bother in racially and ethnically diverse CGs of people with dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings highlight substantial disparities in the timeliness and comprehensiveness of dementia diagnosis. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 993 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global burden associated with physical inactivity is substantial. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Women and racial/ethnic minority dementia caregivers have unique caregiving experiences and support needs. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Longer follow-up and testing across diverse LEP communities are needed to assess diagnosis, treatment initiation, and caregiver trajectories. 1 key finding →
Design: RCT Participants: 287 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Limiting the clinical use of definite anticholinergics may reduce the incidence of cognitive impairment among African Americans. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Despite evidence of ethnic differences in family caregivers' experiences, the extent to which caregiver interventions are culturally tailored to address these differences is unknown. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Many community-residing PWD and their caregivers have unmet dementia-related needs for care, services, and support. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 254 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older age and vascular disease, particularly among African Americans, are associated with increased brain atrophy and WMH burden. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 769 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study provides a review and analysis of the empirical research published since 1985 that has examined the impact of race, culture, and/or ethnicity on the dementia caregiving experience. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 31 028 older adults in MEPS, 5184 (10%) were African American; 146 (<1%) American Indian or Alaska Native; 1043 (3%) Asian (Indian, Chinese, or Filipino); 5346 (10%) Latino; 690 (2%) Other Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander; and 18 617 (75%) were White. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The goal of this study was to determine the patient and caregiver characteristics associated with depression among caregivers of patients with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Primary care is the ideal setting for early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), as it serves as the primary point of care for most older adults. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The family caregivers of PwD exhibited a fair QoL, with a score of 29.01 ± 4.059. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 150 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of caregiver burden was 28.9%. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 602 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Between 1992-2021, global AD cases increased from 4.078 million to 9.837 million, while the global age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) remained relatively stable, rising slightly from 117.7 to 119.8 per 100 000. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
All low-income countries and 59% of the middle-income countries in our sample were found to have far fewer professionals than they need to deliver a core set of mental health interventions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Twenty-one studies based on 18 samples were identified. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Participants were distributed across various regions of Australia: seven interviews from inner regional Australia, five interviews from outer regional Australia, and twenty-one interviews from metropolitan areas. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 30 articles were included. These detail the multifaceted responsibilities of clinical pharmacists in primary care for older people. 5 key findings →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Bisexual caregivers reported more stress, albeit better health than gay caregivers. 5 key findings →
Participants: 286 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (66% of the library) and OpenAlex (16%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,052 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events