You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 1,501–1,525 of 1,593 studies · free to read · tagged Genetics(page 61 of 64)· 28,180 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)
From OpenAlex; 13,658 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
It is now widely accepted that the development of neurodegenerative diseases depends on and affects many pathological processes, both in the brain and the periphery. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100.·Medicine·2025-10-31
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), which is prevalent among older adults, constitutes a major cause of brain hemorrhage, dementia, and cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
The precise regulation of DSCR gene expression is crucial to maintain the brain homeostasis, especially in those areas with high levels of gene expression associated with a remarkable process of learning and cognition. 3 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Medicine·2026-02-06
The role of noise pollution as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD) is unclear, with observational studies yielding conflicting results susceptible to confounding and reverse causality. 3 key findings →
The onset and sustenance of Alzheimers and Parkinsons is solely dependent on the driving power of the immune cytokine interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), arising from neuronal distress and release of sAPPα, which activates microglia for synthesis and release of IL-1β driving synthesis of βAPP, Aβ plaques and synthesis and activation of MAPKp38 for phosphorylation of tau for neurofibrillary tangle formation in Alzheimers and for a-synuclein for formation of Lewy bodies in Parkinsons. 1 key finding →
Familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with various clinical manifestations, making it difficult to diagnose. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Scientific Reports·2026-09-19
In each case the framework recovered known disease genes and identified biologically coherent, disease-specific modules: in AD, 17 stable high-confidence genes and modules enriched in lipid and cholesterol metabolism and amyloid precursor protein processing; in PD, 17 stable genes and modules associated with mitophagy, ubiquitin-proteasome signaling, and mitochondrial dysfunction; in RA, 20 stable genes and modules enriched in antigen presentation and JAK-STAT cytokine signaling. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100.·Cells·2026-06-24
Microglia are central regulators of Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis, but their roles cannot be reduced to a simple protective-versus-harmful dichotomy. 4 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100.·BMC research notes·2010-01-12
The 5' untranslated region (UTR) of the APP gene, encompassing 147 base pairs between the transcriptional (+1) and the translational start site, was examined for its role in APP expression. 4 key findings →
Gene dysregulation in trisomy 21 can cause disorders of genes that are members of the heat-shock proteins (HSPs) family and contribute to the early onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Down syndrome (DS). 2 key findings →
Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), a crucial post-translational modification, is catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs) and has significant implications in various cellular processes, including DNA damage response, cell signaling, and immune processes. 2 key findings →
Of note, using large-scale transcriptome and chromatin profiling, we show that T cell shape microglia-specific metabolic plasticity in both genetic and epigenetic resolution. 2 key findings →
Our findings support apathy and APOE ε4 as robust predictors of conversion to MCI and ADD, and demonstrate novel associations between antidepressant use and conversion. 3 key findings →
CWPs consist predominantly of two novel arrangements of type I Aβ filaments, and we have designated them as type Ic and type Id Aβ filaments. 5 key findings →
We identified an interaction between TDP-43 and APOE through immunoprecipitation followed by proteomics in mice, verified in human brain by co- immunoprecipitation. 5 key findings →
We evaluated known AD-associated loci (Bellenguez et al. 2022) and 27 loci reached nominal significance (p < 0.05) in at least one cognitive domain. 5 key findings →
This diploma thesis presents the work carried out during 6 months within the Laboratory directed by Professor Millet, written under the supervision and with the support of Dr. Benjamin Tournier and Silvia Braconi Quintaje. 5 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.