In the last decade, an important effort was made in the field of Down syndrome to find new interventions that improve cognition. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
In the last decade, an important effort was made in the field of Down syndrome to find new interventions that improve cognition. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Disturbances of the single sugar modification of proteins, O-GlcNAc, have been identified as a potential connection between disrupted brain metabolism and intellectual decay. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Virtually all people with Down syndrome will develop Alzheimer disease pathology during their lifetime. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Subjects with Down Syndrome (DS) have high prevalence of cerebral vascular amyloidosis, cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 25 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A population of >6 million people worldwide at high risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are those with Down Syndrome (DS, caused by trisomy 21 (T21)), 70% of whom develop dementia during lifetime, caused by an extra copy of β-amyloid-(Aβ)-precursor-protein gene. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Down syndrome is the most common viable autosomal trisomy, resulting from an extra copy of chromosome 21, and is the leading genetic cause of intellectual disability. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Mice trisomic for Chromosome (Chr) 16 have been used extensively as an animal model for human Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The results suggest a broad impairment in EF in adolescents with DS, and are consistent with several similar studies conducted with adults with DS. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Down syndrome (DS) is the most frequent cause of mental retardation in man. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Down syndrome (DS) is the most common cause of mental retardation in North America, yet little information is available on the natural history of DS in adults. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Down syndrome (DS) or trisomy 21 is the genetic disease with highest prevalence displaying phenotypic features that both include neurologic deficiencies and a number of clinical outcomes. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Bach1, among the genes encoded on chromosome 21, is a transcription repressor, which binds to antioxidant response elements of DNA thus inhibiting the transcription of specific genes involved in the cell stress response including heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our data supported the presumption of increased oxidative stress in DS. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology progressively with age but clinical signs of dementia are delayed by at least 10 years after the first signs of disease. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Both sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients exhibit increased chromosome aneuploidy, particularly trisomy 21, in neurons and other cells. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ALZ-50 is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes a protein of apparent molecular mass 68 kilodaltons (A68). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The total numbers of neurons and glial cells in the neocortex and basal ganglia in adults with Down syndrome (DS) were estimated with design-based stereological methods, providing quantitative data on brains affected by delayed development and accelerated aging. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Adults with Down syndrome (DS) develop Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology by 40 years of age. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebrovascular pathology is a significant mediator in Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Intracellular protein trafficking via the endosomes plays a key role in the maintenance of normal neuronal function. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that quantification of WM changes in DS could provide a promising and clinically relevant biomarker for AD clinical onset and progression. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This is one of the first formal studies to evaluate research attitudes among relatives of individuals with DS and shows the feasibility of using this approach to answer important questions that will guide trialists developing treatments for AD in DS. 1 key finding →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Several lines of evidence suggest a shared genetic susceptibility to Down syndrome (DS) and Alzheimer disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Participants: 168 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our studies point to increased APP gene dose as a compromising retromer function in DS and suggest a causal role for Aβ42 and Aβ40. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The aim of this study was to test whether there is an excess of dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT) cases in Down syndrome (DS) relatives. 1 key finding →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 536 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →