27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Higher concentrations of pTau181 and GFAP were associated with slower responses on working memory tasks (pTau181: β = 0.261; p = 0.007; GFAP: β = 0.175, p = 0.036), and higher β-amyloid 42/40 ratio was associated with better vocabulary (β = 0.260, p = 0.009). 4 key findings →
Participants: 114 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The search for early biomarkers of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been central to the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and dementia research community in recent years. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Digital cognitive testing using online platforms has emerged as a potentially transformative tool in clinical neuroscience. 3 key findings →
Participants: 325 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
BackgroundEarly diagnosis of early-onset dementia (EOD) is often challenging. 1 key finding →
Participants: 54 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A diagnostic rubric is required to distinguish between limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP). 3 key findings →
Participants: 514 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among the diagnosis cohort, mean (SD) overall spending was $4773 ($9774) per quarter - 43% of which was spending on hospital care ($2048). 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,779 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
SCarlet RoAD (NCT01224106; WN25203), a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study of gantenerumab in prodromal AD, was the first global registration-enabling study using biomarker screening for entry and a single clinical endpoint for outcome. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 312 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
As serum NfL correlates with functional impairment and brain atrophy in bvFTD at different disease stages, we propose it as marker of disease severity, paving the way for its future use as outcome measure for clinical trials. 1 key finding →
Participants: 74 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results suggest that emerging biomarkers in conjunction with core AD markers improve diagnosis of AD, are associated with the conversion from MCI into AD, and predict a faster progression of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 319 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Selected CSF biomarkers at presentation were associated with etiologic diagnoses and treatment responsiveness in patients with heterogeneous causes of RPD. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 44 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results suggest that GSTO locus variants may lower brain GSTO2 levels and consequently confer AD risk in older age. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combined NF-acupuncture therapy, and expect that it will serve as the basis for the use of NF together with acupuncture in the clinical setting. 1 key finding →
Participants: 22 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Since 1989, four Canadian Consensus Conferences on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD) have provided evidence-based dementia guidelines for Canadian clinicians and researchers. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We investigated the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the factors associate with risk of dementia from a representative nationwide sample of Korean elders. 8,199 randomly-sampled Koreans aged 65 years or older were invited to participate in the Phase I screening assessment using Mini-Mental State Examination by door-to-door home visit, and 6,141 subjects (response rate = 74.9%) responded. 2 key findings →
Participants: 6,141 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A thorough understanding of the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of PD is essential to the proper diagnosis of the disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A new interview schedule for the diagnosis and measurement of dementia in the elderly is described. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The global prevalence of dementia is as high as 24 million, and has been predicted to quadruple by the year 2050. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This article presents the revised consensus criteria for the diagnosis of frontotemporal dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on an international research workshop on frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and ALS held in London, Canada in June 2015. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The demographics of aging suggest a great need for the early diagnosis of dementia and the development of preventive strategies. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
20 (45%) patients developed a neurological disorder after a mean of 11.5 years from the reported onset of RBD and a mean follow-up of 5.1 years from the diagnosis of idiopathic RBD at our sleep centre. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
MoCA test better meets the criteria for screening tests for the detection of MCI among patients over 60 years of age than MMSE. 2 key findings →
Participants: 9,350 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a clinical syndrome comprising supranuclear palsy, postural instability, and mild dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These results suggest that the SLUMS and MMSE have comparable sensitivities, specificities, and area under the curve in detecting dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 702 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer's disease (AD) care requires timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary management. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is one of the most common and important aspects of Parkinson's disease and has consequences for patients and caregivers, and has health-related costs. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 1,775 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →