28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Drug development for Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative dementias, including frontotemporal dementia, has experienced a long history of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that failed to show efficacy of investigational drugs. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Regions were heterogeneous at baseline. At baseline, disease severity as measured by ADAS-cog11, ADCS-ADL, and CDR-SB was numerically worse for Eastern Europe/Russia compared with other regions. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathological hallmarks amyloid β (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary (NF) pathology have been reported in the olfactory bulb (OB) in aging and in different neurodegenerative diseases, which coincides with frequently reported olfactory dysfunction in these conditions. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
BBBO was achieved in 5 out of 6 subjects with an average volume of 983±626 mm 3 following FUS at the right frontal lobe both in white and gray matter regions. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients on donepezil showed selective and significant (p<0.05) improvement on the memory subscale of the Dementia Rating Scale. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Behavioural troubles due to frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are difficult to treat. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Curcumin possesses many properties which may prevent or ameliorate pathological processes underlying age-related cognitive decline, dementia or mood disorders. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Rapamycin is not detectable in the CSF before or after treatment, but several Alzheimer's disease and inflammatory biomarkers increase after treatment. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Treatments were generally well tolerated and adverse events (AEs) were seen at similar rates across all treatment groups, with the exception that more injection site reactions were seen in the groups with a higher level of adjuvant. 3 key findings →
Participants: 332 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In the 3 studies combined, the data indicated that rofecoxib more than tripled the risk of confirmed CVT death (risk ratio = 3.57 [1.48-9.72], P = .004). 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle factors are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia in observational studies, and have been targeted by multidomain interventions. 5 key findings →
Participants: 4,162 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These programs are considered beneficial nonpharmacological cognitive training interventions for middle-aged women at high risk of cognitive impairment. 1 key finding →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After its completion in 2028, the EARHLI trial should offer evidence on the effect of hearing treatment versus a health education control on cognitive performance, social engagement, and brain organization/connectivity in 55- to 75-year-old community-dwelling adults with early ARHL and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study protocol is part of a project approved and funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 (grant agreement number 875221). 3 key findings →
Participants: 558 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The groups of individuals who agreed to participate in the imaging substudies of AD trials were remarkably comparable to the comparison groups at baseline on a wide range of demographic and clinical measures; there seems to be a minimal effect of self-selection bias. 4 key findings →
Participants: 166 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It is extensively metabolized in numerous pathways, mainly in the liver via cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, and has a low potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta(1-42) concentration and high total-tau/Abeta(1-42) ratio have been recommended to support the diagnosis of prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and also to select patients for clinical trials (Shaw et al, Ann Neurol 2009;65:403-13; Dubois et al, Lancet Neurol 2007;6:734-46). 4 key findings →
Participants: 400 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD)-modifying therapies are approved for treatment of early-symptomatic AD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 200 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with complex pathophysiology that affects over 50 million people worldwide. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Many trials of drugs aimed at preventing or clearing β-amyloid pathology have failed to demonstrate efficacy in recent years and further trials continue with drugs aimed at the same targets and mechanisms. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Greater spend on social care (including availability of care home places) was associated with reduced spend in health care, with shorter length of hospital stay and decrease in readmissions. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Annotation. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in older adults, characterized by the accumulation of pathological proteins – beta-amyloid (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau protein – resulting in neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The caregivers in intervention group showed significant reductions in distress scores for dressing, personal hygiene, communication, and behavioural and psychological care problems at both the 6th and 12th week assessments. 5 key findings →
Participants: 125 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In the dementia field, a number of applications are being developed aimed at boosting functional abilities. 3 key findings →
Participants: 43 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Various approaches to advance care planning are in use and generally acceptable also for persons with dementia and their care partners. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 1,875 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →