28,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Across the whole-sample, the single-modality models indicated significant correlations between the rate of cognitive decline and the first component of each imaging modality. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 12 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We have carried out a systematic review of the case files of 242 donors with pathologically verified Parkinson's disease at the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders in an attempt to corroborate the data-driven subtype classification proposed by Lewis and colleagues (Heterogeneity of Parkinson's disease in the early clinical stages using a data driven approach. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Whether mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has a distinct neuropathological profile that reflects an intermediate state between no cognitive impairment and dementia is not clear. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 162 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, but the cellular pathways that underlie its pathological progression across brain regions remain poorly understood 1-3 . 4 key findings →
Participants: 48 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Many coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive individuals exhibit abnormal electroencephalographic (EEG) activity reflecting "brain fog" and mild cognitive impairments even months after the acute phase of infection. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 19 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to investigate whether hippocampal TDP-43 is associated with increased rates of hippocampal atrophy. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 205 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aβ-PET was abnormal in 81 participants from J-TRC and 71 participants from BioFINDER. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 474 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The primary constituents of plaques (Aβ42/Aβ40) and neurofibrillary tangles (tau and phosphorylated forms of tau [ptau]) are the current leading diagnostic and prognostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 5,161 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This population-based cohort study demonstrates significant association between IBD and subsequent development of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,742 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The mitochondrial cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been portrayed through molecular, cellular, and animal studies; however large epidemiological studies are lacking. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 790 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings add to growing evidence that women have a differential tau response to Aβ that may emerge at the point of p-tau secretion. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 1,292 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyloid-β (Aβ) triggers the aggregation and spreading of tau pathology, which drives neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 609 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cognitive testing follow-up occurred for 1 to 18 years (mean [SD], 0.98 [2.25] years); autopsy-verified diagnoses were available for 120 of 845 participants with diseases (14.2%). 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 913 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Brain DNA methylation in multiple AD loci is associated with AD pathologies. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 447 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our prospective findings provide evidence for what may be an early contributory role of systemic inflammation in neurodegeneration and cognitive aging. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,633 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These samples were graded on an ordinal scale and genotyped for variants associated with synucleinopathies. 2 key findings →
Participants: 213 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Arterial stiffness was associated with Aβ plaque deposition in the brain, independent of BP and APOE ε4 allele. 5 key findings →
Participants: 91 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From a total of 146 patients, 111 patients were included (67 men [60.4%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 62.5 [11.5] years). 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 146 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 15 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although brain neuroinflammation may play an instrumental role in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease, its actual impact on disease progression remains controversial, being reported as either detrimental or protective. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 33 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study investigated a subtype of reactive astrocytes called A1 and discovered that they are induced by classically activated neuroinflammatory microglia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation and neuroinflammation. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the full cohort, 9.4% were diagnosed with major depression and 8.6% had chronically elevated depressive symptoms, both of which were related to adverse cognitive outcomes. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,965 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Limbic predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) is highly prevalent in late life and a common co-pathology with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Across cohorts, the main biomarker associated with α-synuclein positivity at baseline was higher levels of Aβ pathology (all p values ≤ 0.02), but not tau. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,315 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 6,970 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →