Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. Laboratory science

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

As the brain transitions from wakefulness to sleep, processing of external information diminishes while restorative processes, such as glymphatic removal of waste products, are activated. Yet, it is not known what drives brain clearance during sleep. We here employed an array of technologies and identified tightly synchronized oscillations in norepinephrine, cerebral blood volume, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as the strongest predictors of glymphatic clearance during NREM sleep. Optogenetic stimulation of the locus coeruleus induced anti-correlated changes in vasomotion and CSF signal. Furthermore, stimulation of arterial oscillations enhanced CSF inflow, demonstrating that vasomotion acts as a pump driving CSF into the brain. On the contrary, the sleep aid zolpidem suppressed norepinephrine oscillations and glymphatic flow, highlighting the critical role of norepinephrine-driven vascular dynamics in brain clearance. Thus, the micro-architectural organization of NREM sleep, driven by norepinephrine fluctuations and vascular dynamics, is a key determinant for glymphatic clearance.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hauglund, N. L., Andersen, M., Tokarska, K., Radovanovic, T., Kjaerby, C., Sørensen, F. L., et al. (2025). Norepinephrine-mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.027

Vancouver

Hauglund NL, Andersen M, Tokarska K, Radovanovic T, Kjaerby C, Sørensen FL, et al. Norepinephrine-mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep. Cell. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.027. PMID: 39788123.

BibTeX

@article{hauglund2025-39788123,
  author  = {Hauglund, N. L. and Andersen, M. and Tokarska, K. and Radovanovic, T. and Kjaerby, C. and Sørensen, F. L. and Bojarowska, Z. and Untiet, V. and Ballestero, S. B. and Kolmos, M. G. and Weikop, P. and Hirase, H. and others},
  title   = {{Norepinephrine-mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep}},
  journal = {Cell},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.027},
  pmid    = {39788123},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.027}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study identified tightly synchronized oscillations in norepinephrine, cerebral blood volume and cerebrospinal fluid as the strongest predictors of glymphatic clearance during NREM sleep, and found that the sleep aid zolpidem suppressed norepinephrine oscillations and glymphatic flow. It describes how sleep architecture drives brain waste clearance, which is relevant to understanding clearance mechanisms but does not test an Alzheimer's treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

Limitations

The authors note that prior rodent glymphatic studies relied on anaesthesia as a surrogate for sleep, which suppresses the features of natural sleep, and that human neuroimaging lacks the resolution to quantify CSF flow in the periarterial space, so how these findings translate to humans remains open.

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 59 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 60 of 100. Total 60 of 100.59 of the 98 points we could judge = 60 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 59 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 60 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cell)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Cell: journal h-index 1,220 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 312 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 104.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 109.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 312 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Maiken Nedergaard: h-index 156 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39788123)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 59 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 59 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 60 out of 100.
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Laboratory science

Also tagged “tdp-43”

1,150 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tdp-43”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,150 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Laboratory science

See all studies in Laboratory science →