Home › Research › Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Glial-neurotrophic mechanisms in Down syndrome
Nelson PG, McCune SK, Ades AM, Nelson KB.. Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum, 2001-01-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Complex interactions and interconnectivity between neurons are hallmarks of normal neuronal differentiation and development. Neurons also interact with other cell types, notably glia, and rely on substances released by glia for their normal function. A deficit in glial response may disturb this critical neuronal-glial-neuronal interaction in Down syndrome (DS), leading to loss of neurons and other defects of development, and contribute to cognitive limitation and early onset of Alzheimer disease. The hypothesis this paper will discuss is that normal neural development involves an activity-dependent release of substances from neurons, and that these substances act upon glia cells which in turn release substances that influence neurons to promote their survival and development. This glial influence affects cortical neurons and also the subcortical cholinergic neurons that project to the cerebral and hippocampal cortices to maintain cortical neuronal excitability and activity. The neuronal activity stimulates glial secretion of sustaining substances, in a reciprocally interactive cycle. Some aspect of this "virtuous cycle" is deficient in Down syndrome. The result is a small but slowly increasing deficit in activity-dependent support by glia cells which produces a gradually increasing abnormality of cortical and subcortical, perhaps especially cholinergic, function.
Key findings
- The result is a small but slowly increasing deficit in activity-dependent support by glia cells which produces a gradually increasing abnormality of cortical and subcortical, perhaps especially cholinergic, function.
Why it matters
This paper proposes a hypothesis that deficient glial support in Down syndrome contributes to cognitive limitation and early Alzheimer's disease. It is a theoretical discussion without experimental treatment or prevention data.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 32/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, so that was left out: it earned 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 32 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2001 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.3 citations a year over 27 year(s) since 2001 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 2.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Karin B. Nelson: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 3 / 3 | National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 11771763) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 31 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 32 out of 100. |
| Total | 32 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Nelson, P. G., McCune, S. K., Ades, A. M., & Nelson, K. B. (2001). Glial-neurotrophic mechanisms in Down syndrome. Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6262-0_7
Vancouver
Nelson PG, McCune SK, Ades AM, Nelson KB. Glial-neurotrophic mechanisms in Down syndrome. Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum. 2001. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-6262-0_7. PMID: 11771763.
BibTeX
@article{nelson2001-11771763,
author = {Nelson, P. G. and McCune, S. K. and Ades, A. M. and Nelson, K. B.},
title = {{Glial-neurotrophic mechanisms in Down syndrome}},
journal = {Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum},
year = {2001},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-7091-6262-0_7},
pmid = {11771763},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6262-0_7}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Also tagged “down”
527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.