Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

Results Among 1,231 patients (87.2% women; mean age 46.0 ± 13.7 years; 71.5% chronic migraine), 1,175/1,231 (95.5%) endorsed cognitive symptoms, with a mean Mig-SCog total score of 8.2 ± 4.8. In multivariable regression, migraine frequency classification was not independently associated with cognitive impairment. Women reported significantly greater cognitive impairment than men across all domains (8.4 ± 4.8 vs. 6.8 ± 4.7; p < 0.001, small effect). Word-finding difficulty demonstrated the largest ictal symptom-frequency association, with scores rising from 3.3 ± 2.6 among those never reporting word-finding difficulty to 13.6 ± 3.6 among those always reporting it (adjusted p < 0.001, large effect). In phase-based analyses, word-finding difficulty and impaired concentration were associated with 4.6- and 3.7-point higher cognitive impairment scores than in patients who did not report these symptoms during the prodrome and 5.1- and 4.0-point higher scores during the postdrome, respectively (all p < 0.001, large effects). Among patients with chronic migraine and available disease duration data (n = 661), cognitive burden was lower among those within the first 12 months of chronicity compared with those with longer-standing chronic migraine (7.7 ± 4.9 vs. 9.0 ± 4.6; p = 0.010, d = 0.27).

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 26 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 42 of 100. Raw total 42 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 42 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 42 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 42 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 661 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 26 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 42 out of 100.
Total 42 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Trivedi, M., Chirravuri, R., Schwedt, T. J., Ischii, R., Dumkrieger, G., Dodick, D., et al. (2026). Cognitive Impairment during Migraine Attacks: An Analysis from the American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR). Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11118845/v1

Vancouver

Trivedi M, Chirravuri R, Schwedt TJ, Ischii R, Dumkrieger G, Dodick D, et al. Cognitive Impairment during Migraine Attacks: An Analysis from the American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR). Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11118845/v1.

BibTeX

@article{trivedi2026-9a7ee369,
  author  = {Trivedi, M. and Chirravuri, R. and Schwedt, T. J. and Ischii, R. and Dumkrieger, G. and Dodick, D. and Gottschalk, C. H. and Tepper, S. J. and others},
  title   = {{Cognitive Impairment during Migraine Attacks: An Analysis from the American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR)}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11118845/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11118845/v1}
}

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “reserve”

208 studies in the library carry the topic tag “reserve”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 208 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →