This study demonstrates a disruption of whole-brain topological organization of the functional connectome in aMCI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 37 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
There have been 87 cases of superficial siderosis of the CNS reported in the world literature and 63 cases had developed the clinical syndrome with sufficient details to be reviewed. 1 key finding →
Participants: 22 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia defined by intermittent loss of electromyographic atonia during REM sleep with emergence of complex and vigorous behaviors. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study suggests that amyloid load is significantly raised in over 80% of subjects with DLB, while amyloid pathology is infrequent in PDD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 13 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Given the acknowledged lack of success in Alzheimer's disease (AD) drug development over the past two decades, the objective of this review was to derive key insights from the myriad failures to inform future drug development. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease involves a drastic departure from the cognitive, functional, and behavioural trajectory of normal ageing, and is both a dreaded and highly prevalent cause of disability to individuals, and a leading source of health and social care expenditure for society. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
47/100
Lecanemab can be administered without titration with modest incidence of ARIA. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The amyloid hypothesis has been the dominant framework for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, including the development of anti-AD therapies. 2 key findings →
Participants: 196 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
47/100
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), side effects of anti-amyloid drugs seen in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, are a major safety concern in patients with Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Primary biomarker efficacy endpoints were not statistically significant in either dose group. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aducanumab is the first FDA-approved amyloid-lowering immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease. 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The introduction of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies marks a major shift in Alzheimer's disease (AD) care, moving treatment toward biological modification and reshaping diagnostic and organizational models. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The recent success of disease-modifying anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in slowing Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptoms has been an exciting step forward for the field. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
47/100
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by decreased amyloid-beta (Aβ) clearance, enhanced Aβ aggregation, an increased risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-β are the first approved disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains the leading cause of dementia in Europe, with limited therapeutic options despite decades of research. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated and misfolded tau protein are a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathy conditions. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Tau neurofibrillary tangles are found in the brains of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Argyrophilic grains (ArG) and coiled bodies of argyrophilic grain disease (AgD) and the neurofibrillary lesions of Alzheimer's disease (AD) share similar antigenic determinants, among them hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau. 2 key findings →
Participants: 41 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
47/100
Activation of microglia by classical inflammatory mediators can convert astrocytes into a neurotoxic A1 phenotype in a variety of neurological diseases 1,2 . 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Multiple avenues of research including epidemiology, molecular genetics and cell biology have identified links between Parkinson's disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
47/100
Despite an ever-growing prevalence and increasing economic burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), recent advances in drug development have only resulted in minimally effective treatment. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one of the key molecules modulating brain plasticity. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,389 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Clinical trials of novel therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) have consumed a large amount of time and resources with largely negative results. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Many screening tools for detecting cognitive decline require in-person assessment, which is often not cost-effective or feasible for those with physical limitations. 2 key findings →
Participants: 54 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →